TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
ITF Bastia-Lucciana: Laurent Lokoli vs Rodrigo Alujas
polymarket

Who will win Laurent Lokoli vs Rodrigo Alujas?

Volume:
$3,631

ITF Bastia-Lucciana: Laurent Lokoli vs Rodrigo Alujas

 - Polymarket

ITF Bastia-Lucciana: Laurent Lokoli vs Rodrigo Alujas - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 10, 2026

Closed: Jul 17, 12:30 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

ITF Bastia-Lucciana: Laurent Lokoli vs Rodrigo Alujas

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.8¢
N/A
$3,626
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 2

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Laurent Lokoli and Rodrigo Alujas in the ITF Men Bastia-Lucciana, originally scheduled for July 10, 2026 at 12:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Laurent Lokoli' if Laurent Lokoli advances against Rodrigo Alujas. This market will resolve to 'Rodrigo Alujas' if Rodrigo Alujas advances against Laurent Lokoli. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Laurent Lokoli and Rodrigo Alujas in the ITF Men Bastia-Lucciana, originally scheduled for July 10, 2026 at 12:30PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Laurent Lokoli' if Laurent Lokoli advances against Rodrigo Alujas. This market will resolve to 'Rodrigo Alujas' if Rodrigo Alujas advances against Laurent Lokoli. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Lokoli vs Alujas tennis match displays real-time odds and price history as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. You can monitor how the probability shifts as new information emerges, track cumulative trading volume, and observe 24-hour volume metrics to gauge market activity and liquidity. The interface lets you see the current consensus forecast alongside historical price movements, helping you understand how market sentiment has evolved since the market opened. This transparency into both current odds and trading patterns is central to how prediction markets operate.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets are driven by trader consensus—real money on the line from participants with skin in the game. This market aggregates the collective judgment of traders rather than a bookmaker's risk management. Over time, prediction markets have proven competitive with or more accurate than traditional sportsbook pricing, especially when the crowd has access to real-time information. Comparing this market's odds to major sportsbooks can reveal where informed traders see value.

On Polymarket, this market is priced through an automated market maker (AMM) model where traders buy and sell shares representing each outcome. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each share fluctuates based on supply and demand; as more traders back one outcome, its price rises and the opposing outcome's price falls. This continuous pricing mechanism ensures the market stays liquid and responsive to new information. Traders can enter or exit positions at any time before the market closes, and the final price reflects the aggregated belief of all participants about which player will win.

This market resolves around Jul 17, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the official match result—which player wins the ITF Bastia-Lucciana event. Once the event is confirmed through reliable sources, the market settles accordingly, and traders' positions are finalized based on whether their prediction matched the actual outcome. All shares representing the winning outcome become worth their full value, while losing shares expire worthless.

Several factors could shift odds before Jul 17, 2026. Recent player form, head-to-head records, and court surface preferences are classic tennis catalysts. Injury reports or withdrawal announcements would trigger sharp repricing. Weather conditions at the venue, seeding changes, or draws affecting the tournament bracket can also influence trader sentiment. Social media buzz, expert commentary, and betting action from respected accounts may sway the crowd. As the match date approaches, any official updates from the tournament organizers or player camps could prompt rapid trading activity. Real-time match conditions—if live betting data becomes available—would be the strongest signal closest to play.