TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$133,388,117
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,436,095,462
405,232
Markets across
30,526
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,693
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 15, 6:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Martina Trevisan and Katerina Tsygourova in the ITF Women Aschaffenburg, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Martina Trevisan' if Martina Trevisan advances against Katerina Tsygourova. This market will resolve to 'Katerina Tsygourova' if Katerina Tsygourova advances against Martina Trevisan. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Martina Trevisan and Katerina Tsygourova in the ITF Women Aschaffenburg, originally scheduled for July 8, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Martina Trevisan' if Martina Trevisan advances against Katerina Tsygourova. This market will resolve to 'Katerina Tsygourova' if Katerina Tsygourova advances against Martina Trevisan. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market may show odds that differ from major sportsbooks, revealing where the crowd of prediction traders sees value differently than oddsmakers. Comparing the two can highlight consensus gaps and potential mispricings worth investigating before the match begins.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the collective confidence of all active traders; if more capital flows toward Trevisan, her share price rises and the implied probability increases. Conversely, heavy selling pressure on either player lowers that outcome's price. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the market stays responsive to new information and trader conviction throughout the lead-up to the match.
This market resolves around Jul 15, 2026, once the Aschaffenburg match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the official match result—which player wins the contest. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while losing positions expire worthless. Until that point, prices will fluctuate based on pre-match analysis, player news, and evolving trader sentiment.
Several factors could shift prices before Jul 15, 2026. Injury announcements or withdrawal news involving either player would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and surface-specific form updates often sway trader positioning. Court conditions, weather forecasts, and lineup changes in the draw can also influence conviction. Additionally, any public statements from the players or coaching staff about fitness or strategy may prompt traders to reassess probabilities and adjust their positions accordingly.