TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$107,351,958
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,416,970,024
400,720
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,633
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 11, 5:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Jakub Nicod and Hazem Naw in the ITF Men Amstelveen, originally scheduled for July 4, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Jakub Nicod' if Jakub Nicod advances against Hazem Naw. This market will resolve to 'Hazem Naw' if Hazem Naw advances against Jakub Nicod. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Jakub Nicod and Hazem Naw in the ITF Men Amstelveen, originally scheduled for July 4, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Jakub Nicod' if Jakub Nicod advances against Hazem Naw. This market will resolve to 'Hazem Naw' if Hazem Naw advances against Jakub Nicod. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one are driven purely by trader conviction and information flow. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper, more efficient pricing because participants have real money at stake and no house edge distorts the line. Comparing this market's implied probability to major sportsbooks can reveal where bettors and traders disagree on the likely outcome.
On Polymarket, traders set the odds through an automated market maker that adjusts prices based on buy and sell pressure. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Each share represents a claim on one outcome, and the price reflects the collective belief of all participants about which player will win. As more traders buy shares in one outcome, the price rises and the implied probability increases. The market remains open to new trades until the event concludes, allowing prices to incorporate breaking news, injury updates, or shifts in player form right up until match time.
This market resolves around Jul 11, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verified against credible public sources. The outcome is determined by which player wins the ITF Amstelveen event. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while those on the losing side forfeit their stake. Resolution typically occurs within hours of the final point, once the official result is confirmed and published by the tournament organizer or recognized tennis data providers.
Several factors can shift odds in this market before Jul 11, 2026. Injury announcements or withdrawal news involving either player would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and surface-specific form updates often prompt trader repositioning. Court conditions, weather forecasts, and player fatigue from earlier rounds can also influence sentiment. Media reports on player confidence, coaching changes, or fitness concerns may spark volatility. Close matches or upsets elsewhere in the draw can reshape expectations about momentum and seeding dynamics, prompting traders to adjust their positions.