TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$107,351,958
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,416,970,024
400,720
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,633
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
ITF Alkmaar: Marente Sijbesma vs Isis Louise Van Den Broek Set 1 O/U 8.5
- Polymarket
ITF Alkmaar: Marente Sijbesma vs Isis Louise Van Den Broek Set 1 O/U 8.5 - Polymarket
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
Vol.
·
Resolved Jun 25, 2026
Closed: Jul 2, 5:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Marente Sijbesma and Isis Louise Van Den Broek in the ITF Women Alkmaar, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Marente Sijbesma' if Marente Sijbesma advances against Isis Louise Van Den Broek. This market will resolve to 'Isis Louise Van Den Broek' if Isis Louise Van Den Broek advances against Marente Sijbesma. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Marente Sijbesma and Isis Louise Van Den Broek in the ITF Women Alkmaar, originally scheduled for June 25, 2026 at 5:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Marente Sijbesma' if Marente Sijbesma advances against Isis Louise Van Den Broek. This market will resolve to 'Isis Louise Van Den Broek' if Isis Louise Van Den Broek advances against Marente Sijbesma. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like Polymarket are driven by trader consensus and real-money incentives to forecast accurately. For this market, comparing the implied probability to major sportsbook lines can reveal whether traders are pricing the outcome differently than traditional oddsmakers. Prediction markets sometimes incorporate information faster or reflect sharper analysis, though sportsbooks benefit from professional risk management. Both sources offer useful signals, but they operate independently and may weight the same factors differently.
On Polymarket, traders set the price of this market through an automated market maker that adjusts odds based on buy and sell pressure. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current implied probability reflects the collective forecast of all participants trading shares. As more traders back one outcome, the price moves higher; conversely, selling pressure drives it lower. This continuous repricing mechanism ensures the market stays responsive to new information, player updates, or betting patterns. The spread between bid and ask prices depends on liquidity and recent trading activity, so monitoring order flow can help you time entries and exits effectively.
This market resolves around Jul 2, 2026, once the ITF Alkmaar match concludes and the result is verified against credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the official match result—specifically, which player wins the contest. No ambiguity exists in determining a winner under standard tennis rules, so resolution is typically straightforward once the match is complete and confirmed by the tournament organizer or reliable sports data providers. Traders should monitor the event schedule to ensure they understand the exact timing and any potential delays due to weather or other unforeseen circumstances.
Several factors could shift this market significantly before Jul 2, 2026. Player injury reports, recent match results, or changes in form leading up to the event often trigger repricing. Court surface conditions, weather forecasts, and head-to-head history may also influence trader sentiment. Betting patterns from sharp bettors or sportsbooks can signal new information and prompt market adjustments. Any official announcements regarding the tournament schedule, player withdrawals, or venue changes could create volatility. Monitoring tennis news outlets and social media for updates on either competitor's preparation or fitness will help you anticipate moves and identify trading opportunities.