TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Isurus vs. MIBR Academy: Map 2
kalshi

Who will win Isurus vs. MIBR Academy Map 2?

Volume:
$33,690

MIBR Academy

 - Kalshi

MIBR Academy - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 26, 2026

Closed: Jun 26, 3:34 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

MIBR Academy

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$19,412
N/A
N/A
$9,839
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Isurus

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$14,278
N/A
N/A
$8,448
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

Isurus and MIBR Academy compete in Map 2 of their CS2 match at the Thunderpick World Championship South American Series #1 2026 on June 26, 2026. The winner of this individual map advances their position in the tournament series.

Kalshi

Resolution is determined by the outcome of Map 2 in the specified CS2 match. Isurus winning Map 2 resolves to Yes for the Isurus market, while MIBR Academy winning Map 2 resolves to Yes for the MIBR Academy market. The match is scheduled for June 26, 2026 at 2:00 PM EDT as part of the Thunderpick World Championship South American Series #1 2026.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Isurus vs. MIBR Academy Map 2 match displays real-time odds and price movements as traders position themselves on the outcome. You can monitor the current probability implied by the market, review historical price charts, and track 24-hour trading volume to gauge liquidity and interest. This snapshot helps you understand how the prediction market is pricing the matchup at any given moment, from pre-match through resolution. The interface updates continuously as new trades execute, reflecting fresh information and shifting sentiment among participants.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders risking real capital on outcomes. This market's odds represent a crowd-sourced probability estimate from participants who profit by being accurate. Comparing this market's implied odds to major sportsbook lines can reveal where consensus differs, though prediction markets and traditional betting venues may weight the same information differently based on their respective market dynamics and user composition.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through an order-book mechanism where traders buy and sell shares representing the outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each share reflects the collective assessment of participants, with bids and asks converging toward an equilibrium that balances supply and demand. As new information emerges—team roster updates, recent form, or tactical adjustments—traders adjust their positions, moving the price. The spread between buy and sell prices indicates liquidity; tighter spreads suggest higher confidence and more active trading, while wider spreads may reflect uncertainty or lower participation.

This market resolves around Jun 26, 2026, once the Map 2 match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by which team wins the map under the official rules of competitive play. Resolution typically occurs shortly after the match ends, pending confirmation from tournament organizers or verified esports reporting. Traders should monitor official match schedules and results to anticipate the resolution window and ensure their positions reflect the latest information.

Several catalysts can shift odds before resolution. Roster changes, player injuries, or unexpected roster swaps may alter perceived team strength. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and map-specific performance data can influence trader sentiment. Pre-match commentary from analysts and team statements about strategy or preparation often trigger repricing. In-game developments—such as early round outcomes or visible tactical adjustments during the match itself—can cause sharp moves as traders update their beliefs. Monitoring team social media, esports news outlets, and live match commentary helps identify these signals early.