TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
INOX Division vs. SPARTA: Map 2
kalshi

INOX Division vs. SPARTA: Map 2

Volume:
$20,190

INOX Division

 - Kalshi

INOX Division - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 17, 2026

Closed: Jun 17, 9:54 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

INOX Division

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$7,669
N/A
N/A
$6,005
Settled
Yes
kalshi

SPARTA

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$12,521
N/A
N/A
$7,597
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

INOX Division and SPARTA will compete in the second map of their Counter-Strike 2 match during the European Pro League Series 7 2026. The winner of this individual map will determine the resolution of this market.

Kalshi

Resolution is determined by the outcome of map 2 in the INOX Division vs. SPARTA CS2 match scheduled for June 17, 2026 at 6:30 AM EDT as part of the European Pro League Series 7 2026. Whichever team wins the map will cause the market to resolve to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the INOX Division vs. SPARTA Map 2 esports match displays real-time odds and historical price movement as traders position themselves on the outcome. You can monitor current market sentiment, recent trading activity, and cumulative volume to gauge how prediction market participants are evaluating this competitive matchup. The interface updates continuously, allowing you to track shifts in probability as new information emerges about team form, roster changes, or pre-match analysis. This live data helps you understand where the crowd stands relative to your own assessment of the event.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant pools and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets aggregate the beliefs of traders risking real capital on outcomes. For this market, comparing Kalshi odds to major sportsbook lines can reveal whether one venue perceives the matchup differently—perhaps due to sharper analysis, slower information flow, or distinct user demographics. Neither source is inherently more accurate; discrepancies often highlight where informed traders see value relative to traditional oddsmakers.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order-book mechanism where traders buy and sell shares representing each possible outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The bid-ask spread reflects the current liquidity and conviction among participants; tighter spreads indicate strong consensus, while wider spreads suggest uncertainty or lower trading volume. As new information surfaces—team announcements, player performance data, or expert commentary—traders adjust their positions, moving the price to reflect updated probabilities. Your entry and exit prices depend on the depth of orders available at any given moment.

This market resolves around Jun 17, 2026, once the Map 2 result is finalized and verifiable from credible public sources. The outcome is determined by the official match result as reported by the esports organization, league, or broadcast authority overseeing the competition. Until that point, prices may fluctuate based on live-match developments, team performance trends, and trader sentiment. Resolution is binary: one team either wins or does not, with no partial or conditional payouts.

Several catalysts could shift prices before this market closes. Roster changes, player injuries, or surprise lineup announcements from either team may alter perceived strength. Pre-match commentary from analysts, coach interviews, or leaked practice footage can sway trader confidence. Live in-game momentum—early map control, economy management, or tactical adjustments—will likely trigger sharp repricing as the match unfolds. Additionally, historical head-to-head records, recent tournament results, and meta-game shifts in the underlying esports title all influence how traders reassess the probability of each outcome.