TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
India vs. Qatar
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of India vs Qatar?

Volume:
$72,226

Qatar

 - Kalshi

Qatar - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 10:30 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Qatar

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$26,909
N/A
N/A
$19,757
Settled
Yes
kalshi

India

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$29,858
N/A
N/A
$17,182
Settled
No
polymarket

India vs. Qatar

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$15,459
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers the outcome of a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game between India and Qatar scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 8:30 AM EDT. Markets across Polymarket and Kalshi are pricing the winner of this professional matchup.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution logic is internally contradictory: both a Qatar win and an India win resolve to Yes, making the market logically unresolvable. Polymarket has clear, mutually exclusive binary outcomes.Hero tip: Do not trade on Kalshi's version. The market cannot settle correctly because both possible outcomes map to the same resolution state. Trade only Polymarket until Kalshi corrects its contract terms.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary outcome market with mutually exclusive resolution. India win resolves to India, Qatar win resolves to Qatar. Handles postponement by keeping market open; cancellation without makeup resolves 50-50. Resolution based on final score including overtime.
  • Kalshi: Logically contradictory resolution criteria. Both 'If Qatar wins' and 'If India wins' resolve to Yes, creating an impossible settlement scenario where the market cannot distinguish between outcomes.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Asia game, scheduled for July 2 at 8:30AM ET: If the India win, the market will resolve to "India". If the Qatar win, the market will resolve to "Qatar". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the final result of the Qatar vs India professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game originally scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 8:30 AM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes, provided the reschedule occurs within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled and not played, or rescheduled beyond two weeks from the original date, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like those tracked here operate on peer-to-peer trading rather than fixed sportsbook lines. Instead of a bookmaker setting odds, traders buy and sell shares representing each outcome, and the market price reflects the collective belief of all participants. Sportsbooks, by contrast, set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins. Prediction market odds often converge toward true probability over time because traders have direct financial incentive to correct mispricings. For major sporting events, prediction market consensus frequently aligns with or outperforms traditional sportsbook lines, especially as new information emerges.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates independently with its own liquidity pools, user base, and fee structures. Polymarket and Kalshi may attract different trader demographics and risk appetites, leading to temporary price gaps. Platform-specific rules, withdrawal policies, and market depth also influence how quickly prices adjust to new information. Additionally, traders on one venue may not immediately arbitrage away small spreads due to transaction costs or platform friction. These differences typically narrow as the event date approaches and more capital flows toward the true probability, but short-term divergences create opportunities for informed traders monitoring both markets.

Key catalysts include team lineups and confirmed starting rosters, which often shift odds significantly once announced. Injury updates to star players, recent form and head-to-head records, and any last-minute tactical changes can trigger sharp moves. Weather conditions at the venue and travel or logistical disruptions may also influence trader sentiment. Media coverage, expert predictions, and social media momentum can amplify volatility, especially among retail traders. As the match date draws closer, late-breaking news—such as visa issues, player suspensions, or unexpected team changes—typically generates the largest price swings. Monitoring these developments helps traders anticipate and react to market repricing.