TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,590,312

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,439,516,703

404,175

Markets across

30,277

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,685

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus
polymarket
kalshi

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus

Volume:
$243,552

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Kalshi

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 12, 2026

Closed: Jun 17, 4:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$92,946
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Tatiana Prozorova

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$57,226
N/A
N/A
$34,344
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$1,276
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 1 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$106
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$56
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 1 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$35
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Sinja Kraus

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$91,854
N/A
N/A
$51,322
Settled
No
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 1 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$17
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Total Sets: O/U 2.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Match O/U 22.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$12
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Match O/U 21.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$7
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 1 O/U 9.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Match O/U 23.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set Handicap +/-1.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 2 O/U 9.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 2 O/U 10.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 2 Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Ilkley: Tatiana Prozorova vs Sinja Kraus Set 2 O/U 8.5

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 18

Description

A collection of 14 prediction markets covering the professional tennis match between Tatiana Prozorova and Sinja Kraus at the 2026 WTA 125K Ilkley tournament, scheduled for June 10, 2026. Markets span match winner, set winners, game totals, and set handicaps across Polymarket and Kalshi platforms.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket provides exhaustive resolution logic for all match outcomes (retirement, default, walkover, cancellation, delay); Kalshi uses minimal criteria (ball played + winner determined) without explicit edge-case guidance, creating ambiguity for incomplete or forfeited matches.Hero tip: Polymarket markets are safer for edge-case scenarios due to explicit 50-50 and advancement rules. Kalshi's Yes/No structure may fail to resolve clearly if a walkover, retirement, or cancellation occurs. Verify Kalshi's exact handling of forfeits and incomplete matches before trading.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: 13 markets with granular resolution rules. Match winner advances if opponent retires/defaults; resolves 50-50 for walkovers, cancellations, or delays beyond 7 days. Completed match requires all sets/games through normal play; forfeits resolve No. Game/set totals resolve 50-50 if match incomplete. Primary source: Official WTA Tour or credible consensus. Key Quote: 'If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances.'
  • Kalshi: 1 binary market (Yes/No) resolving Yes if either player wins after a ball is played. No explicit rules for walkovers, retirements, forfeits, cancellations, or delays. Scope limited to winner determination post-play. Key Quote: 'If Tatiana Prozorova wins the Prozorova vs Kraus professional tennis match in the 2026 WTA 125K Ilkley Round Of 16 after a ball has been played, then the market resolves to Yes.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Tatiana Prozorova and Sinja Kraus in the Ilkley, originally scheduled for June 10, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Tatiana Prozorova' if Tatiana Prozorova advances against Sinja Kraus. This market will resolve to 'Sinja Kraus' if Sinja Kraus advances against Tatiana Prozorova. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

This event covers the professional tennis match between Tatiana Prozorova and Sinja Kraus in the 2026 WTA 125K Ilkley Round of 16. Resolution requires that a ball has been played in the match. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market will resolve to a fair price per standard rules. Should the match be postponed or delayed, the market remains open and will close following the rescheduled match completion within two weeks.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price tennis matches through different mechanisms. Sportsbooks employ oddsmakers and manage liability; prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs in real time. Prediction market odds often reflect sharper, more dynamic pricing because traders risk capital directly and can adjust positions continuously. However, sportsbook odds may incorporate additional factors like injury reports or late-breaking news faster in some cases. For this matchup, comparing this market's consensus odds to major sportsbook lines can reveal value opportunities, though prediction markets typically converge toward consensus as the event date nears.

Polymarket and Kalshi may show different implied probabilities due to distinct user bases, fee structures, and market depth. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Platform design also matters: Polymarket uses an automated market maker, while Kalshi employs order books, leading to different price discovery dynamics. Liquidity concentration varies between venues, so large trades can move one platform more than the other. Additionally, each platform's rules and dispute resolution processes may attract different trader demographics with varying risk tolerances and information sets, naturally creating temporary price spreads that arbitrageurs gradually narrow.