TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 12, 12:40 PM EST
Kalshi
This event group covers a professional tennis match between Dane Sweeny and Billy Harris at the 2026 ATP Challenger in Ilkley, with markets spanning match winner, set outcomes, game totals, and completion status. The match was originally scheduled for June 10-11, 2026 at approximately 5:00-6:00 AM ET.
This market refers to the tennis match between Dane Sweeny and Billy Harris in the Ilkley, originally scheduled for June 10, 2026 at 6:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Dane Sweeny' if Dane Sweeny advances against Billy Harris. This market will resolve to 'Billy Harris' if Billy Harris advances against Dane Sweeny. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolution requires that a ball has been played in the Sweeny vs Harris professional tennis match at the 2026 ATP Challenger Ilkley Round of 16. The market resolves to Yes for whichever player wins the match. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or other cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price per the rules. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks.
Polymarket and Kalshi may show different odds due to variations in user base, liquidity depth, and market microstructure. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts traders with different risk tolerances and information sets, so prices can lag or lead depending on where new money flows first. Liquidity imbalances also matter: thinner order books on one venue can amplify price swings, while deeper pools on another keep pricing more stable. Arbitrage traders work to close these gaps, but temporary spreads often persist, creating opportunities for sharp bettors monitoring both sites.
Key catalysts include fighter interviews, training footage, weigh-in results, and any injury announcements from either camp. Betting action on external sportsbooks can also influence prediction market prices as sharp money moves between venues. Media coverage and expert commentary often trigger repricing as new analysis reaches traders. Recent performance clips, strength-and-conditioning updates, or coaching changes would all carry weight. Watch for late-breaking news in the 48 hours before the event, when final adjustments typically occur and volatility often spikes across both platforms.