TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.2b
24H VOL:
$126,324,530
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,434,646,834
406,019
Markets across
30,401
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,689
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 21, 6:30 AM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Ashlyn Krueger and Celine Naef in the Ilkley, originally scheduled for June 14, 2026 at 6:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Ashlyn Krueger' if Ashlyn Krueger advances against Celine Naef. This market will resolve to 'Celine Naef' if Celine Naef advances against Ashlyn Krueger. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This market refers to the tennis match between Ashlyn Krueger and Celine Naef in the Ilkley, originally scheduled for June 14, 2026 at 6:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Ashlyn Krueger' if Ashlyn Krueger advances against Celine Naef. This market will resolve to 'Celine Naef' if Celine Naef advances against Ashlyn Krueger. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes differently because they operate under distinct incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one reflect genuine trader conviction—each participant risks real capital on their belief. This market aggregates dispersed information from many independent forecasters, often surfacing consensus faster than sportsbooks adjust their lines. Comparing the two can reveal where public opinion diverges from professional oddsmaking, though both sources offer valuable perspective on match likelihood.
On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in an automated market maker system. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Each share represents a claim on one player winning; the price of a share reflects the market's implied probability of that outcome. As fresh bets flow in, the price adjusts continuously to balance supply and demand. This mechanism ensures that the odds you see always represent the marginal trader's current assessment, making the market responsive to breaking news, injury reports, or other match-relevant developments.
This market resolves around Jun 21, 2026, once the match concludes and the winner is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome is determined by the official result of the tennis match between the two players. Until that point, traders can continue to buy and sell shares as odds fluctuate. Resolution is final once the event is confirmed through established sports news sources, at which time payouts are distributed to holders of the winning outcome.
Several catalysts could shift odds significantly before the match begins. Player injury announcements, withdrawal news, or fitness updates would trigger immediate repricing. Recent tournament performance, head-to-head records, and surface suitability (clay, grass, hard court) all influence trader positioning. Weather forecasts closer to match day may favor one player's style. Betting activity from sharp traders or sudden volume spikes can also signal new information entering the market. Any official scheduling changes or venue updates would ripple through this market as traders reassess their positions.