TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
HSBC Championships, Qualification: Martin Damm vs Daniel Merida Aguilar
kalshi
polymarket

HSBC Championships, Qualification: Martin Damm vs Daniel Merida Aguilar

Volume:
$4,198

HSBC Championships, Qualification: Martin Damm vs Daniel Merida Aguilar

 - Polymarket

HSBC Championships, Qualification: Martin Damm vs Daniel Merida Aguilar - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 13, 2026

Closed: Jun 20, 7:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

HSBC Championships, Qualification: Martin Damm vs Daniel Merida Aguilar

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$4,158
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Martin Damm Jr wins 2-0

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$40
N/A
N/A
$40
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Martin Damm Jr wins 2-1

View
N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Daniel Merida wins 2-1

View
N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Daniel Merida wins 2-0

View
N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Completed Match

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 6

Description

This event group covers a professional tennis match between Martin Damm and Daniel Merida Aguilar in the 2026 ATP London (HSBC Championships) Qualification Round 1, scheduled for June 13, 2026 at 7:00 AM ET. Markets track both match completion and match winner outcomes across two prediction platforms.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi focuses on match winner by set score (assumes completion), while Polymarket separates match completion from winner determination and explicitly handles walkovers, retirements, and cancellations with different outcomes (50-50 vs. advancing player vs. No).Hero tip: Monitor match status closely. If the match is completed normally, both platforms should align on the winner. If a walkover occurs before play starts, Polymarket winner market resolves 50-50 while Kalshi has no defined path. If a retirement occurs mid-match, Polymarket winner market resolves to the advancing player; Kalshi's set-score logic does not apply. Always check official ATP Tour records for match completion status.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: Winner-only resolution: Resolves Yes if Martin Damm Jr wins 2-0 or 2-1, or if Daniel Merida wins 2-0 or 2-1. No explicit edge case handling for walkovers, retirements, or cancellations. Key quote: 'If Martin Damm Jr wins...by a set score of 2-1, then the market resolves to Yes.'
  • Polymarket: Dual-market approach: Completion market (Yes/No) requires all sets/games played to normal completion; resolves No for forfeits, walkovers, cancellations, or delays beyond 7 days. Winner market resolves to advancing player if retirement/default occurs mid-match, or 50-50 if walkover before start or cancellation. Key quote: 'If a forfeit of any kind occurs, including but not limited to a walkover or retirement, this market will resolve No' (completion); 'If the match begins but is not completed...one player advances due to...retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances' (winner).
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Martin Damm and Daniel Merida Aguilar in the HSBC Championships, Qualification, originally scheduled for June 13, 2026 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Martin Damm' if Martin Damm advances against Daniel Merida Aguilar. This market will resolve to 'Daniel Merida Aguilar' if Daniel Merida Aguilar advances against Martin Damm. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the final set score of the match played in the 2026 ATP London Qualification Round 1. If the match does not commence due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation before play begins, the market resolves to a fair price. Postponed or delayed matches remain open until the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are settled at Fair Market Price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

PredictionHero aggregates prediction market data across Polymarket and Kalshi to track the Damm vs Merida Aguilar match in real time. Traders on both platforms are pricing the likelihood of specific outcomes—such as a straight-sets victory or match completion—using their own order books and consensus mechanisms. The dashboard displays current odds, historical price movements, and trading volume across venues, giving you a unified view of how the market collectively assesses this qualification event. This cross-platform lens reveals whether consensus is building or diverging between communities.

Prediction market odds and traditional sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different liquidity pools, risk models, and trader bases. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and manage liability; prediction markets aggregate decentralized trader beliefs in real time. This market may show tighter or wider spreads than sportsbooks depending on how much capital is deployed and how confident traders are about the match outcome. Comparing the two can reveal arbitrage opportunities or signal where informed money is flowing.

Polymarket and Kalshi may price this market differently due to variations in contract design, user base composition, and liquidity depth. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. For example, one platform may offer a binary on match completion while the other focuses on set score, attracting different trader strategies. Regulatory frameworks, fee structures, and the timing of order flow also influence how quickly each platform's price responds to new information. Monitoring both helps you identify mispricings and understand which venue has stronger conviction.

Player form, recent head-to-head records, court conditions, and injury reports are key catalysts that can shift odds before the match begins. News of lineup changes, weather delays, or tournament bracket updates may also trigger repricing. During play, real-time score updates and momentum swings often cause sharp price moves as traders update their edge. Monitoring tennis news feeds and social sentiment can help you anticipate volatility and spot value shifts in this market.