TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Hanshin Tigers vs. Tokyo Yakult Swallows
polymarket
kalshi

Who will win the Hanshin Tigers vs. Tokyo Yakult Swallows game?

Volume:
$214,002

Hanshin Tigers

 - Kalshi

Hanshin Tigers - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 12, 2026

Closed: Jul 12, 7:54 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Hanshin Tigers

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$86,368
N/A
N/A
$53,012
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Hanshin Tigers vs. Tokyo Yakult Swallows

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$673
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Tokyo Yakult Swallows

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$126,960
N/A
N/A
$71,777
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

A head-to-head NPB (Nippon Professional Baseball) matchup between the Hanshin Tigers and Tokyo Yakult Swallows scheduled for July 12, 2026 at 5:00 AM EDT. The market resolves based on which team wins the game, with special handling for postponements, cancellations, and ties.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution logic contains a logical contradiction: both a Swallows win and a Tigers win are stated to resolve to Yes, making the market fundamentally unresolvable and unable to differentiate outcomes.Hero tip: Do not trade on Kalshi until the resolution criteria are corrected. The market cannot function as written because both possible game outcomes trigger the same resolution (Yes). Polymarket's binary structure is logically sound and should be the reference market.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Clear binary winner-take-all structure. Tigers win resolves to Hanshin Tigers, Swallows win resolves to Tokyo Yakult Swallows. Ties, cancellations, and postponements without makeup games resolve 50-50. Source: NPB official site.
  • Kalshi: Contradictory resolution logic. States both Tigers win AND Swallows win resolve to Yes, creating logical impossibility. No differentiation between outcomes possible. No tie/cancellation handling specified.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming NPB game, scheduled for July 12 at 5:00AM ET: If the Hanshin Tigers win, the market will resolve to "Hanshin Tigers". If the Tokyo Yakult Swallows win, the market will resolve to "Tokyo Yakult Swallows". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, or ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.

Kalshi

This event covers a Japan NPB game between Tokyo Yakult Swallows and Hanshin Tigers originally scheduled for July 12, 2026 at 5:00 AM EDT. Each team has a corresponding market that resolves to Yes if that team wins the game. If the game is postponed or delayed, markets remain open and close after the rescheduled game concludes within two days. Should the game be cancelled or rescheduled beyond two days, markets resolve to a fair price per official rules. Tied games result in 50/50 resolution across all markets.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like these operate on real money and transparent order books, often reflecting sharper, less-biased estimates than traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks build in margins and adjust lines to balance action, while prediction traders compete directly on accuracy. This market's odds should track closely with major Japanese sports betting venues, though prediction markets may move faster during breaking news or lineup changes. Comparing the two can reveal value opportunities or consensus shifts.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which can create temporary price gaps on the same event. Polymarket's order-book model and Kalshi's binary contract mechanics may weight information differently, and geographic or regulatory factors can influence participation. These spreads typically narrow as the event date approaches and arbitrageurs exploit mispricings, but they offer opportunities to understand how market structure shapes belief.

Key catalysts include roster announcements, injury updates to star players, recent team performance streaks, and head-to-head historical trends. Weather conditions on game day, home-field advantage dynamics, and late-breaking lineup changes can all shift trader sentiment. Media coverage and expert commentary may also influence positioning, especially if new information about team form or matchup dynamics emerges closer to the scheduled date.