TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Gwangju FC vs. Jeju SK FC
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Gwangju FC vs. Jeju SK FC?

Volume:
$126,420

Jeju SK FC

 - Polymarket

Jeju SK FC - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 9, 2026

Closed: Sep 9, 10:25 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Jeju SK FC

View
100%
51%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$83,992
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Gwangju FC

View
0%
23%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$23,810
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Both Teams To Score

View
0%
52%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$17,464
N/A
N/A
$15,093
Settled
No
polymarket

Draw (Gwangju FC vs. Jeju SK FC)

View
0%
28%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,154
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 4

Description

This group forecasts the outcome of a K League 1 soccer match between Gwangju FC and Jeju SK FC scheduled for September 9, 2026. Markets cover which team will win, whether the game will end in a draw, and whether both teams will score.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket explicitly handles game cancellations by resolving to 'No', while Kalshi does not address this scenario, potentially leaving markets open indefinitely.Hero tip: Consider the risk of open Kalshi markets if a cancellation occurs, as they may not resolve, impacting your potential payout. Polymarket offers a defined resolution in this scenario.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Markets resolve 'Yes' for a Gwangju win, 'No' for a Jeju win or draw. Cancellation resolves to 'No'. Uses official stats, then Flashscore/Sofascore if official stats are delayed. "If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No"."
  • Kalshi: Focuses on whether both teams score. Does not specify cancellation handling. Relies on 90 minutes + stoppage time. "If Gwangju and Jeju SK both score...then the market resolves to Yes."
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming K-League game, scheduled for Wednesday, September 9, 2026 between Gwangju FC and Jeju SK FC.

Kalshi

If Gwangju and Jeju SK both score a goal in the Gwangju vs Jeju SK Korea K League 1 match originally scheduled for Sep 9, 2026 after 90 minutes plus stoppage time (does not include extra time or penalties), then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On PredictionHero, this dashboard tracks the consensus view on the outcome of the K League 1 match. It aggregates data from multiple prediction market platforms, including Polymarket and Kalshi, to provide a comprehensive overview of where traders are placing their bets. Currently, the total volume across these platforms is $126,420, with $125,074 traded in the last 24 hours. This allows for a broader understanding of expectations than any single platform provides, reflecting the collective wisdom of the crowd regarding this particular match.

Prediction market odds often differ from traditional sportsbook odds due to the differing incentives of participants. Sportsbooks aim to profit by setting lines that attract balanced betting, while prediction market participants are incentivized to accurately forecast the outcome. This can lead to prediction markets being more efficient at reflecting true probabilities, particularly as more information becomes available. While sportsbooks may adjust odds based on public perception or liability, this market relies on direct, incentivized forecasting. However, arbitrage opportunities can emerge, allowing traders to profit from discrepancies between the two.