TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks vs. Chiba Lotte Marines
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks vs. Chiba Lotte Marines?

Volume:
$255,357

Chiba Lotte Marines

 - Kalshi

Chiba Lotte Marines - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 9, 2026

Closed: Jul 4, 3:54 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Chiba Lotte Marines

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$97,499
N/A
N/A
$61,681
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Fukuoka Hawks

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$157,384
N/A
N/A
$113,474
Settled
No
polymarket

Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks vs. Chiba Lotte Marines

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$473
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers a single NPB (Nippon Professional Baseball) game between the Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks and Chiba Lotte Marines scheduled for July 4, 2026 at 1:00 AM EDT. Markets on both Polymarket and Kalshi are betting on the outcome of this game, with resolution tied to which team wins.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi market contains a logical contradiction: both possible game outcomes (Hawks win and Marines win) are mapped to Yes resolution, leaving no condition for No resolution. This makes the market fundamentally unresolvable.Hero tip: Avoid trading Kalshi until the platform corrects the market definition. Polymarket's binary outcome structure is logically sound and should be the reference market for this event.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary outcome market with three resolution paths: Hawks win resolves to Hawks, Marines win resolves to Marines, tie/cancellation/no makeup resolves 50-50. Logically complete and resolvable.
  • Kalshi: Yes/No market with critical flaw: both Hawks win and Marines win are stated to resolve to Yes, with no stated condition for No resolution. Market is logically contradictory and unresolvable as written.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming NPB game, scheduled for July 4 at 1:00AM ET: If the Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks win, the market will resolve to "Fukuoka SoftBank Hawks". If the Chiba Lotte Marines win, the market will resolve to "Chiba Lotte Marines". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, or ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.

Kalshi

This market covers the Chiba Lotte Marines vs Fukuoka Hawks NPB game originally scheduled for July 4, 2026 at 1:00 AM EDT. Resolution depends on the final game outcome: if the Marines win, their market resolves Yes; if the Hawks win, their market resolves Yes. If the game is postponed or delayed, markets remain open until the rescheduled game concludes within two days. Should the game be cancelled or rescheduled beyond two days, markets resolve to a fair price per official rules. In the event of a tie, both markets resolve to 50/50.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like those tracked here operate independently of traditional sportsbooks, often reflecting different liquidity pools and trader demographics. While sportsbooks employ professional oddsmakers and manage liability through margin, prediction markets aggregate decentralized trader beliefs in real time. This market's pricing may diverge from sportsbook lines due to variations in volume, risk appetite, and information flow. Comparing the two can reveal whether professional bookmakers or crowd-sourced traders are more bullish on a particular outcome, though both ultimately aim to reflect true game probabilities.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under distinct market rules, fee structures, and user bases, which naturally produces price variation. Polymarket and Kalshi may attract traders with different risk tolerances, information sets, or time horizons. Liquidity depth also varies between venues; thinner order books can amplify price swings in response to large trades. Additionally, platform-specific mechanics—such as position limits, withdrawal policies, or settlement timelines—can influence how aggressively traders commit capital, causing temporary or sustained divergence until arbitrage pressure realigns prices.