TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$103,397,351

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,410,176,180

399,592

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,622

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Fluminense FC vs. Red Bull Bragantino
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Fluminense FC vs. Red Bull Bragantino?

Volume:
$1,652,167

Tie

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 18, 2026

Closed: Jul 17, 9:11 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Tie

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$179,515
N/A
N/A
$90,561
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Draw (Fluminense FC vs. Red Bull Bragantino)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$83,643
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Fluminense

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$400,811
N/A
N/A
$204,972
Settled
No
polymarket

Fluminense FC

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$287,637
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Bragantino

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$384,596
N/A
N/A
$249,658
Settled
No
polymarket

Red Bull Bragantino

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$315,965
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Intro

This market tracks the outcome of a Brazilian Série A soccer match between Fluminense FC and Red Bull Bragantino. Aggregating data from Polymarket and Kalshi, the consensus probability for a draw stands at 100.0%, while Red Bull Bragantino winning registers at 0.1%. Resolution will be determined by the official result from the Confederação Brasileira de Futebol following the match on July 17, 2026. Watch for any official announcements regarding match postponement or cancellation, as these could trigger alternative resolution procedures.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket offers three separate binary markets with outcome-dependent cancellation logic (Draw resolves Yes on cancellation, while Win markets resolve No), whereas Kalshi presents a single omnibus market that resolves Yes for any match outcome. Additionally, Kalshi does not explicitly address cancellation or postponement scenarios.Hero tip: On Polymarket, the Draw market is the only one that benefits from cancellation (resolves Yes), creating a hedge opportunity. On Kalshi, the market structure guarantees payout if the match occurs at all, but traders must clarify the platform's cancellation policy before trading. Consider the asymmetry: Polymarket's three markets are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive only if the game is played; Kalshi's omnibus design eliminates outcome risk but introduces platform-specific cancellation risk.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Three separate binary markets (Fluminense Win, Draw, Bragantino Win). Cancellation logic is outcome-dependent: Win markets resolve No if canceled with no makeup; Draw market resolves Yes if canceled. Resolution source: CBF official statistics or credible consensus within 2 hours. Quote: 'If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No"' (Win markets) vs. 'this market will resolve to "Yes"' (Draw market).
  • Kalshi: Single omnibus market where all three outcomes (Fluminense win, Bragantino win, Tie) resolve to Yes. No explicit cancellation or postponement clause provided. Resolution source not specified. Quote: 'If Fluminense wins... then the market resolves to Yes. If Bragantino wins... then the market resolves to Yes. If Tie is the result... then the market resolves to Yes.'
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming Brazil Série A game, scheduled for Friday, July 17, 2026 between Fluminense FC and Red Bull Bragantino.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the final result of the Fluminense vs Bragantino Brasileiro Serie A match after 90 minutes plus stoppage time, excluding extra time and penalties. Each outcome—Fluminense win, Bragantino win, or tie—resolves its corresponding market to Yes based on the match result. If the match is cancelled or rescheduled more than two weeks from the original July 17, 2026 date, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

The dashboard aggregates prediction market data across Polymarket and Kalshi for the Fluminense vs. Bragantino match, allowing traders to monitor real-time odds on the match outcome. Both venues track the same event but may display slightly different probabilities based on their independent order books and user bases. This cross-platform view helps you spot consensus pricing and identify where the broader prediction market community stands on the fixture. Volume and price discovery across both platforms reflect genuine trader conviction about the likely result.

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price outcomes differently because they serve different audiences and operate under distinct regulatory frameworks. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and manage risk, often incorporating a margin. Prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi rely on peer-to-peer trading, where prices emerge from direct supply and demand. This can make prediction markets more responsive to new information and less subject to house margins. However, sportsbook odds may reflect sharper professional betting syndicates, while prediction markets aggregate a broader retail consensus. Comparing both sources often yields valuable perspective on true probability.

Key catalysts include team news such as injuries to star players, lineup announcements, or tactical changes disclosed before kickoff. Recent form, head-to-head records, and any off-field controversies can shift trader sentiment. Weather conditions at the venue may influence play style and scoring expectations. Major betting syndicates entering or exiting positions can trigger sharp price moves. Social media sentiment and expert commentary often precede retail trader activity. Close to match time, late-breaking injury reports or lineup confirmations typically drive the most volatile repricing. Monitor official team social channels and sports news outlets for real-time updates that could reshape odds.