TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
European T20 Premier League: Dublin Guardians vs Amsterdam Flames
kalshi
polymarket

European T20 Premier League: Dublin Guardians vs Amsterdam Flames

Volume:
$1,274,856

Amsterdam Flames

 - Kalshi

Amsterdam Flames - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 5, 2026

Closed: Sep 5, 1:00 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Amsterdam Flames

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$623,924
N/A
N/A
$182,067
Settled
Yes
polymarket

European T20 Premier League: Dublin Guardians vs Amsterdam Flames - Who wins the toss?

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
$226
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Dublin Guardians

0%
39%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$595,974
N/A
N/A
$190,320
Settled
No
polymarket

European T20 Premier League: Dublin Guardians vs Amsterdam Flames

0%
46%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$54,732
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

European T20 Premier League: Dublin Guardians vs Amsterdam Flames - Completed match?

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 5

Intro

This market tracks whether the European T20 Premier League match between the Dublin Guardians and Amsterdam Flames will be completed as scheduled. Currently, the consensus probability of the match being completed is 100.0%. This assessment aggregates data from Kalshi and Polymarket, and will resolve based on official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers, with ESPNcricinfo as a reference source. Keep an eye on the match scheduled for September 5, 2026, as the outcome of that game will determine resolution.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All platforms use the same core resolution logic based on official match results, tiebreak outcomes, and governing body declarations.Primary resolution logic: Official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers, with ESPNcricinfo as a reference source

Core resolution logic:

  • A winning team declaration resolves Yes markets for match winner
  • Tied matches with tiebreaks resolve according to tiebreak winner
  • Tied matches without tiebreaks resolve 50-50
  • Canceled, abandoned, or No Result matches resolve 50-50 or No for completion market
  • Toss winner resolves regardless of subsequent match status

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Postponement: Markets remain open until the rescheduled match date concludes
  • Forfeit/Walkover: Counts as an ordinary win for the non-forfeiting team
  • DLS/DRS Decisions: Count as official results for resolution
Timing: Resolution occurs after official match statistics are published by the governing body or event organizers, with a fallback to credible reporting within 2 hours of match conclusionOur PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the cricket match between Dublin Guardians and Amsterdam Flames scheduled for September 5 2026 in European T20 Premier League. DLS/DRS, over-rate penalties, forfeit/walkover, or any other on-field ruling that leads the competition to declare a winner are treated as ordinary wins. If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution. If the match ends tied and no on-field tiebreak is used or available under the playing conditions (e.g., group-stage ODI with no Super Over), the market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed/rescheduled, the market remains open until the listed fixture is completed. If the match is permanently canceled or abandoned or otherwise is completed without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

Kalshi

Markets resolve to Yes for the specified team if that team wins the match as scheduled. If the match ends in a tie, draw, no result, abandonment, cancellation, or insufficient play to determine a winner, all markets resolve to $0.50. Forfeits or disqualifications before the match begin also result in $0.50 for all markets. If a forfeit or disqualification occurs after play has started and the governing body declares an official winner, the market resolves based on that result.

Frequently asked questions

The dashboard for the Dublin vs Amsterdam T20 match aggregates real-time data from multiple prediction markets, showing how traders price the chances of different outcomes. It displays total volume of $1,274,856 and 24-hour volume of $1,272,720 across platforms, letting you see where consensus lies. Because this market is followed on several venues, the dashboard also highlights any notable differences in how each exchange evaluates the match. This gives a clear snapshot of market sentiment and activity around the Dublin vs Amsterdam T20 match as it evolves toward resolution.

Prices on Polymarket and Kalshi can vary because each platform attracts different user groups and may apply unique liquidity incentives. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. For instance, one venue might have deeper liquidity for certain outcomes, pulling its prices toward where the most active traders are positioned. Additionally, trading volume patterns—such as a surge in activity on one platform alone—can shift its odds independently of the other. These dynamics mean that Polymarket and Kalshi often show distinct implied probabilities, even though they are ultimately betting on the same real-world result.

Key signals that could shift this market include injury updates or lineup changes for either team, weather forecasts affecting pitch conditions, and any high-profile performances in preceding matches that influence perception of momentum. Media coverage highlighting tactical adjustments or strategic advantages may also sway trader sentiment. As the event nears, betting trends on either platform can amplify price swings, especially if volume spikes on one venue. All of these factors—on-field developments, news reports, and trading activity—have the potential to move this market significantly before it settles.