TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Estonia vs. Slovenia
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Estonia vs Slovenia?

Volume:
$83,426

Estonia

 - Kalshi

Estonia - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 3, 2026

Closed: Jul 3, 2:00 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Estonia

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$42,314
N/A
N/A
$34,138
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Estonia vs. Slovenia

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$9,711
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Slovenia

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$31,402
N/A
N/A
$17,917
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers the outcome of a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game between Estonia and Slovenia scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 12:00 PM EDT. Markets across Polymarket and Kalshi are tracking whether Estonia or Slovenia wins this professional matchup.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi market contains a logical contradiction where both Estonia win and Slovenia win are stated to resolve to Yes, making the market fundamentally unresolvable. Polymarket uses standard binary logic.Hero tip: Do not trade the Kalshi market in its current form. The resolution terms are internally contradictory - a single game cannot have both teams winning. Polymarket's binary structure is the only logically coherent market in this group. Request clarification from Kalshi or treat this as a data integrity failure.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary outcome market with clear mutually exclusive resolution paths. Estonia win resolves to Estonia, Slovenia win resolves to Slovenia. Postponement keeps market open; cancellation resolves 50-50. Resolution based on final score including overtime.
  • Kalshi: Market terms state both Estonia win and Slovenia win resolve to Yes, creating logical impossibility. No explicit handling of postponement or cancellation stated. This contradicts the nature of a binary sporting event.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Europe game, scheduled for July 3 at 12:00PM ET: If the Estonia win, the market will resolve to "Estonia". If the Slovenia win, the market will resolve to "Slovenia". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

Resolution is determined by the final result of the Slovenia vs Estonia professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 12:00 PM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled and not played, or rescheduled beyond two weeks, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes using different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets rely on continuous trader participation to discover prices. This market reflects what thousands of independent traders believe will happen, often incorporating real-time information faster than sportsbooks adjust their lines. Prediction market odds tend to be sharper and less influenced by public betting patterns, making them a useful benchmark for comparing against your preferred sportsbook. Many bettors use both sources to identify value and validate their own edge.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which naturally produces price variation. Polymarket and Kalshi may also have subtle differences in how they word or resolve outcomes, leading traders to interpret risk slightly differently. Regulatory constraints, user interface design, and promotional incentives on each venue can shift where capital flows. When spreads widen between platforms, arbitrageurs typically step in to close the gap, but temporary divergence is normal and creates opportunities for alert traders to exploit mispricings before consensus realigns.

Key injury announcements, lineup changes, or managerial decisions can shift odds significantly in the days before kickoff. Recent form, head-to-head records, and weather conditions at the venue may also trigger repricing as match day nears. Betting syndicates and sharp money entering either platform can move prices quickly, signaling where informed traders see value. Live betting activity during the match itself will cause continuous swings as goals are scored and momentum shifts. Monitor team news feeds and platform volume to catch early moves before consensus fully adjusts.