TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
DSC Arminia Bielefeld vs. FC Energie Cottbus
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of DSC Arminia Bielefeld vs FC Energie Cottbus?

Volume:
$156,014

DSC Arminia Bielefeld

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Kalshi

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Aug 16, 2026

Closed: Aug 16, 12:01 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

DSC Arminia Bielefeld

View
100%
45%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$93,715
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Bielefeld advances

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$3,598
N/A
N/A
$3,141
Settled
No
kalshi

Großaspach advances

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$3,238
N/A
N/A
$3,153
Settled
Yes
polymarket

FC Energie Cottbus

0%
20%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$54,023
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Draw (DSC Arminia Bielefeld vs. FC Energie Cottbus)

0%
23%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,440
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 5

Description

This event group covers the upcoming soccer match between DSC Arminia Bielefeld and FC Energie Cottbus scheduled for August 16, 2026. The markets focus on determining the outcome of the match, including whether Bielefeld wins, whether the match ends in a draw, and whether Cottbus wins.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All markets resolve based on the official final result recognized by the governing body or event organizers, with consistent handling of cancellations and post-hoc revisions.Primary resolution logic: Official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers

Core resolution logic:

  • The market resolves based on the official match outcome within 90 minutes plus stoppage time
  • If the game is canceled with no make-up, Bielefeld and Cottbus win markets resolve to No, draw market resolves to Yes
  • Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution are not considered

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Postponement: Markets remain open until the game is completed
  • Cancellation: If the game is canceled entirely with no make-up, Bielefeld and Cottbus win markets resolve to No, draw market resolves to Yes
Timing: Markets resolve based on official statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, or via credible reporting consensus if official data is delayedOur PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming 2. Bundesliga game, scheduled for Sunday, August 16, 2026 between DSC Arminia Bielefeld and FC Energie Cottbus.

Kalshi

If Großaspach advance past Bielefeld in the Großaspach vs Bielefeld soccer tie in the Round 1 of the DFB Pokal, then the market resolves to Yes. If Bielefeld advance past Großaspach in the Großaspach vs Bielefeld soccer tie in the Round 1 of the DFB Pokal, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

Price differences between Polymarket and Kalshi can arise from varying user bases, liquidity levels, and market design features. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. For instance, one platform might attract more international traders, skewing probabilities based on global sentiment, while the other could reflect a more localized view. Additionally, differing fee structures and order types influence how traders place bets, often leading to divergent chances even for the same underlying event.