TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Curitiba: Pedro Sakamoto vs Santiago De la Fuente
🌟New
polymarket

What is the result of Pedro Sakamoto vs Santiago De la Fuente?

Volume:
$161,394

Curitiba: Pedro Sakamoto vs Santiago De la Fuente

 - Polymarket

Curitiba: Pedro Sakamoto vs Santiago De la Fuente - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 28, 2026

Closed: Sep 28, 4:09 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Curitiba: Pedro Sakamoto vs Santiago De la Fuente

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$160,414
N/A
N/A
N/A
5d 18h 13m
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$980
N/A
N/A
N/A
5d 18h 13m
Yes
Total markets: 2

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Pedro Sakamoto and Santiago De la Fuente in the Curitiba, Brazil, Qualifying, originally scheduled for September 28, 2026 at 10:10AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Pedro Sakamoto' if Pedro Sakamoto advances against Santiago De la Fuente. This market will resolve to 'Santiago De la Fuente' if Santiago De la Fuente advances against Pedro Sakamoto. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by October 12, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Pedro Sakamoto and Santiago De la Fuente in the Curitiba, Brazil, Qualifying, originally scheduled for September 28, 2026 at 10:10AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Pedro Sakamoto' if Pedro Sakamoto advances against Santiago De la Fuente. This market will resolve to 'Santiago De la Fuente' if Santiago De la Fuente advances against Pedro Sakamoto. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by October 12, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Curitiba mayoral race tracks the evolving probabilities of different outcomes, represented as implied probabilities. You can view the current odds, historical price movements, and 24-hour trading volume, which is currently $160,349. The total volume traded on this market to date is $160,349. This allows users to gauge market sentiment and see how predictions are changing as new information becomes available. The dashboard provides a real-time view of where traders are placing their bets in this important election.

Prediction market odds often reflect a different kind of wisdom than those found at sportsbooks. Sportsbooks typically set lines to balance action and ensure profit, while this market aggregates the beliefs of a diverse group of forecasters. As such, you may see differences in implied probabilities. Generally, prediction markets are considered to be highly accurate, sometimes even more so than traditional polling data, as they incentivize participants to express their genuine beliefs. It’s important to consider both sources of information when forming your own opinion on the outcome of the Curitiba mayoral race.

On Polymarket, this market is priced through a continuous auction mechanism, where traders buy and sell shares representing their belief in the probability of a particular outcome. The price of a share directly corresponds to the implied probability of that outcome occurring. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The more shares bought, the higher the price, and vice versa. This dynamic pricing ensures that the market reflects the collective intelligence of all participants, constantly updating as new information emerges regarding the candidates and the election itself. The current price reflects the aggregated predictions of those trading on Polymarket.

This market resolves around Oct 5, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Resolution will be based on which candidate is officially declared the winner of the Curitiba mayoral election by the relevant electoral authorities. The platform will rely on official results released by these authorities to determine the winning outcome. Traders will then be able to claim their winnings or adjust their positions based on the final, verified result. It’s important to monitor news sources leading up to and following the election date for updates on the resolution process.

Several signals could significantly impact this market. Major endorsements from influential political figures, shifts in public opinion revealed through polling data, and significant campaign events like debates or rallies could all cause price movements. Unexpected economic news affecting Curitiba, or scandals involving either candidate, would also likely influence trading activity. Furthermore, any changes to electoral regulations or challenges to the validity of the election process could introduce volatility. Monitoring these factors will be key to understanding how this market evolves as we approach the resolution date.