TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Counter-Strike: Wildcard vs Exilium (BO1) - Urban Riga Open #3 Group D
polymarket

Counter-Strike: Wildcard vs Exilium (BO1) - Urban Riga Open #3 Group D

Volume:
$2,139

Match Winner

 - Polymarket

Match Winner - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Mar 24, 2026

Closed: Mar 23, 11:50 PM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Match Winner

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$2,104
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Odd/Even Total Rounds

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$20
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Odd/Even Total Kills

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$16
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market refers to the Counter-Strike match between Wildcard and Exilium in the Urban Riga Open #3 Group D, initially scheduled for March 23 at 5:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "Wildcard" if Wildcard win the match against Exilium. This market will resolve to "Exilium" if Exilium win the match against Wildcard. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.