TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Counter-Strike: LPH Gaming vs EAC Rising (BO3) - United21 Group D
kalshi
polymarket

Who will win LPH Gaming vs EAC Rising?

Volume:
$55,685

EAC Rising

 - Kalshi

EAC Rising - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 10, 2026

Closed: Jul 10, 8:19 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

EAC Rising

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$16,989
N/A
N/A
$13,501
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map Handicap: EAC Rising (-1.5) vs LPH Gaming (+1.5)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$15
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

LPH Gaming

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$13,322
N/A
N/A
$6,166
Settled
No
polymarket

Match Winner

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$13,180
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 2 Winner

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$10,616
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 1 Winner

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,265
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

O/U 2.5 Games

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$294
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map Handicap: LPH (-1.5) vs EAC Rising (+1.5)

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5

View
50%
Yes 50¢No 50¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Map 1 Rounds Handicap: EAC Rising (-3.5) vs LPH Gaming (+3.5)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 1 Rounds Handicap: EAC Rising (-6.5) vs LPH Gaming (+6.5)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 1 Rounds Handicap: EAC Rising (-9.5) vs LPH Gaming (+9.5)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 2 Rounds Handicap: EAC Rising (-6.5) vs LPH Gaming (+6.5)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 2 Rounds Handicap: EAC Rising (-3.5) vs LPH Gaming (+3.5)

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
20¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Map 2 Rounds Handicap: EAC Rising (-9.5) vs LPH Gaming (+9.5)

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 19

Description

This event group covers a Counter-Strike: Global Offensive Best-of-3 elimination match between LPH Gaming and EAC Rising in the United21 Group D tournament, scheduled for July 10, 2026 at 6:30 AM EDT. Markets span match winner, individual map winners, total games, map handicaps, and round totals across all three potential maps.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

All platforms (Kalshi and Polymarket) apply identical resolution logic: HLTV.org as primary source, 2-hour publication window, 50-50 for cancellations/delays beyond 7 days/ties/pre-match forfeits, and completion-based resolution for maps and rounds.Primary resolution logic: Official HLTV.org match results; credible consensus reporting (including video evidence) if HLTV.org does not publish within 2 hours of match conclusion

Core resolution logic:

  • Match Winner (BO3): Resolves to the team winning 2 maps; if match is canceled, delayed beyond 7 days without play, ends in a tie, or ends in a pre-match forfeit/disqualification/walkover, resolves 50-50
  • Map 1/2 Winner: Resolves to the team winning the individual map if map is completed; if map is not completed, not played, or decided by forfeit/disqualification/walkover, resolves 50-50; if match is canceled or delayed beyond 7 days without play, resolves 50-50
  • Games Total (O/U 2.5): Resolves Over if 3+ maps are played (including maps won by forfeit/disqualification/walkover if match is completed); resolves Under if fewer than 3 maps are played; if match is canceled, delayed beyond 7 days without play, ends in a tie, or begins but does not complete with a winner, resolves 50-50
  • Map Handicap (LPH -1.5 vs EAC +1.5): Resolves to LPH if they win 2+ more maps than EAC (including forfeit/disqualification/walkover maps if match is completed); otherwise resolves to EAC; if match is canceled, delayed beyond 7 days without play, ends in a tie, or begins but does not complete with a winner, resolves 50-50
  • Map Round Totals (O/U 21.5): Resolves Over if combined rounds on that map exceed 21.5; resolves Under if combined rounds are less than 21.5; resolves 50-50 if exactly 21.5 rounds; map must be completed via actual rounds played (not forfeit/disqualification/walkover); if map is not played, not completed, or decided by non-round means, resolves 50-50; if match is canceled or delayed beyond 7 days without map completion, resolves 50-50

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Partial Match Forfeiture: If the match begins but one team forfeits/is disqualified mid-series (after at least one map is completed), the team winning the completed maps wins the match. If a team forfeits before the match starts, the market resolves 50-50.
  • Map Completion via Forfeit on Clinching Map: If the clinching map (Map 3 in a BO3) is forfeited, the match is considered completed and resolves to the team that won the clinching map by forfeit. Games Total and Map Handicap count this as a completed match.
  • Overtime Rounds: All overtime rounds are included in the round total for Map Round Total markets (O/U 21.5).
  • Exact Round Count of 21.5: If a map ends with exactly 21 combined rounds (e.g., 11-10), the Map Round Total market resolves 50-50.
  • Delay Beyond 7 Days: If the match is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date (July 10, 2026) without play beginning, all markets resolve 50-50.
Timing: Resolution occurs upon match completion (when a team wins 2 maps in the BO3). If HLTV.org does not publish results within 2 hours of match conclusion, credible consensus reporting is used. Markets for individual maps resolve upon that map's completion. Round total markets resolve upon the respective map's completion or 50-50 if the map is not played to completion.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the Counter-Strike Elimination match between LPH Gaming and EAC Rising in the United21 Group D, initially scheduled for July 10 at 6:30AM ET. This market will resolve to "LPH Gaming" if LPH Gaming win the match against EAC Rising. This market will resolve to "EAC Rising" if EAC Rising win the match against LPH Gaming. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins. If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence. In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.

Kalshi

If EAC Rising wins the United21 2026: EAC Rising vs. LPH Gaming CS2 match originally scheduled for Jul 10, 2026 at 6:30 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If LPH Gaming wins the United21 2026: EAC Rising vs. LPH Gaming CS2 match originally scheduled for Jul 10, 2026 at 6:30 AM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs through continuous price discovery. This market reflects real-time consensus from thousands of participants rather than a single operator's margin. Prediction market odds often lead sportsbook lines because traders have direct financial incentive to identify mispricings early. However, sportsbooks may offer tighter spreads on high-volume events. Comparing both sources helps you identify where the market disagrees with conventional wisdom.

Polymarket and Kalshi operate under different regulatory frameworks, user bases, and market-making mechanisms, which can create temporary price divergence. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform's liquidity pool, fee structure, and order-flow patterns influence how quickly prices adjust to new information. Polymarket may attract institutional traders, while Kalshi draws a different demographic, leading to distinct risk assessments. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these gaps, but friction costs and withdrawal delays can prevent instant convergence. Monitoring both platforms reveals where conviction differs and helps identify undervalued or overvalued outcomes on either side.

Key catalysts include recent team performance data, player roster changes, injury announcements, and head-to-head map history. Tournament bracket positioning and seeding can shift expectations if either team advances or faces unexpected opponents. Betting volume spikes often precede match day as casual traders enter the market. Live in-game events—such as early map wins or momentum shifts—will drive intraday volatility. Community sentiment on social media and esports forums can amplify price moves if major storylines emerge. Monitoring team practice clips, coach statements, and pre-match interviews helps traders anticipate directional moves before the market fully prices them in.