TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Colorado vs Northwestern: D/ST Touchdown
kalshi

What is the result of Colorado vs Northwestern?

Volume:
$1,364

D/ST touchdown

 - Kalshi

D/ST touchdown - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 20, 2026

Closed: Sep 19, 10:54 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

D/ST touchdown

View
0%
34%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1,364
N/A
N/A
$1,307
Settled
No
Total markets: 1

Description

The Colorado versus Northwestern game will be analyzed for any defensive or special teams touchdowns, which serve as a benchmark for unexpected turns in play. These scores highlight the importance of all units on the field, not just the offensive squad, in determining a game's outcome.

Kalshi

If Colorado and Northwestern collectively record at least 1 defensive or special teams touchdown in the Colorado vs Northwestern college football game originally scheduled for Sep 19, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Colorado-Northwestern defensive touchdown market displays the current price, price history, and 24-hour trading volume. You can see how the market is valuing the likelihood of a defensive touchdown being scored in the game. Currently, the total volume for this market is $1,364, with $1,358 traded in the last 24 hours. This allows traders to gauge market sentiment and identify potential trading opportunities related to this specific outcome within the game.

Generally, prediction market odds tend to reflect the collective wisdom of a diverse group of traders, often leading to more accurate probabilities than those offered by traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks may incorporate biases or seek to profit from public perception, whereas this market is driven by individuals incentivized to predict the correct outcome. However, sportsbook odds can still be a useful data point for comparison, and discrepancies between the two can sometimes present arbitrage opportunities for informed traders. It’s important to note that these are independent assessments of probability.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order book where traders buy and sell contracts representing the probability of a defensive touchdown being scored. The price of a contract ranges from 0 to 100, representing the implied probability. As more traders buy contracts, the price increases, indicating a higher perceived chance of the event occurring. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. This dynamic pricing mechanism allows the market to quickly incorporate new information and adjust its assessment of the likelihood of a defensive touchdown. The current price reflects the aggregated expectations of all participants.

This market resolves around Sep 20, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Resolution will depend on whether a defensive touchdown is officially recorded in the game statistics. Official game results, as reported by recognized sports data providers, will be used to determine if a defensive touchdown occurred. The market will then settle based on whether a 'yes' or 'no' outcome is verified, with payouts distributed accordingly to contract holders.

Several factors could influence the price of this market. News regarding injuries to key defensive players on either team could significantly shift expectations. Changes in weather conditions, particularly those favoring strong defensive play, might also impact the market. In-game events, such as turnovers or exceptional defensive stands, could also cause rapid price movements. Finally, any significant public sentiment shifts, perhaps driven by expert analysis or social media discussion, could also contribute to changes in this market’s pricing.