TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Colombia vs. Chile
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Colombia vs. Chile?

Volume:
$191,379

Chile

 - Kalshi

Chile - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 4, 2026

Closed: Jul 3, 9:50 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Chile

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$93,648
N/A
N/A
$52,139
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Colombia

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$81,009
N/A
N/A
$44,247
Settled
No
polymarket

Colombia vs. Chile

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$16,722
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers the outcome of a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers Americas basketball game between Colombia and Chile scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 8:00 PM EDT. Markets across Polymarket and Kalshi are pricing the binary outcome of which team wins the match.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution criteria contains a logical contradiction: both possible game outcomes (Colombia win or Chile win) resolve to Yes, making the binary market unresolvable and eliminating the No outcome entirely.Hero tip: Do not trade Kalshi's version. The market cannot resolve to No under any realistic game scenario. Polymarket's binary structure is logically sound and should be used for directional exposure. Request clarification from Kalshi on whether this is a data error.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Clean binary outcome: resolves to Colombia or Chile based on final score including overtime. Postponement keeps market open; cancellation without makeup resolves 50-50. Logically coherent.
  • Kalshi: Logical tautology: market resolves Yes if Chile wins AND Yes if Colombia wins, eliminating any No resolution path. No outcome is specified for postponement or cancellation. Fundamentally unresolvable as structured.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Americas game, scheduled for July 3 at 8:00PM ET: If the Colombia win, the market will resolve to "Colombia". If the Chile win, the market will resolve to "Chile". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

Resolution is determined by the winner of the Chile vs Colombia professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game originally scheduled for July 3, 2026 at 8:00 PM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes, provided the reschedule occurs within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled or rescheduled beyond two weeks, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with the rules.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price events differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract a margin, while prediction markets aggregate decentralized trader beliefs in real time. This market reflects what thousands of independent traders believe will happen, often incorporating information faster than sportsbooks adjust their lines. Prediction market odds tend to be sharper and more reactive to breaking news, injuries, or team announcements. However, sportsbook odds benefit from professional oddsmakers and risk management. Comparing both sources can reveal inefficiencies and help you identify where the crowd consensus diverges from professional estimates.

Polymarket and Kalshi operate under different market designs, user bases, and liquidity profiles. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts traders with varying risk appetites and information sets, leading to temporary price gaps. Polymarket may see heavier volume from certain trader cohorts, while Kalshi draws a distinct demographic. Regulatory differences, fee structures, and order-book depth also influence how quickly each platform reprices in response to news. These divergences typically narrow closer to resolution but can persist if one platform has better liquidity or faster-moving participants. Savvy traders monitor both to spot arbitrage opportunities or to gauge which platform's crowd is more confident.

Key catalysts include team roster announcements, injury reports, and official lineups released closer to kickoff. Unexpected coaching changes, disciplinary suspensions, or weather conditions at the venue can shift trader conviction significantly. Recent head-to-head form, tournament context, and any geopolitical or scheduling disruptions may also influence sentiment. Media narratives and expert punditry often ripple through prediction markets as traders incorporate new analysis. Large trades or sudden volume spikes on either platform can signal informed positioning. Monitoring social media, sports news, and betting flow across both venues helps you anticipate moves before they fully price in.