TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Clube do Remo vs. EC Vitória
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Clube do Remo vs. EC Vitória?

Volume:
$624,718

Remo

 - Kalshi

Remo - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 27, 2026

Closed: Jul 26, 8:31 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Remo

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$284,346
N/A
N/A
$198,759
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Clube do Remo

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$87,441
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Vitoria

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$164,757
N/A
N/A
$100,619
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$60,790
N/A
N/A
$44,073
Settled
No
polymarket

Draw (Clube do Remo vs. EC Vitória)

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$10,349
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

EC Vitória

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$17,034
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Intro

This market tracks whether Clube do Remo will win their Brazilian Serie A soccer match against EC Vitória on July 26, 2026. The aggregated consensus probability for Clube do Remo to win stands at 100.0%, with EC Vitória at 0.1%. Data is aggregated from Polymarket and Kalshi, and resolved using official statistics from CBF (Confederação Brasileira de Futebol). Watch for the match conclusion on July 26, 2026, as this will determine the final outcome.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

Both platforms apply identical resolution logic: official CBF result after 90 minutes plus stoppage time, with consistent postponement and cancellation handling across all three outcome markets.Primary resolution logic: Official statistics from CBF (Confederação Brasileira de Futebol) as the governing body for Brazilian Serie A; secondary source is consensus of credible reporting if official stats not published within 2 hours of match conclusion.

Core resolution logic:

  • Resolution is based on the official final result after 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time only; extra time and penalties are excluded.
  • Remo win market resolves Yes if Remo scores more goals; No otherwise.
  • Draw market resolves Yes if both teams score equal goals; No if either team wins.
  • Vitória win market resolves Yes if Vitória scores more goals; No otherwise.
  • If the match is postponed, all markets remain open until the match is completed and official result is declared.
  • If the match is canceled entirely with no makeup game, Remo and Vitória win markets resolve to No; draw market resolves to Yes.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Match Postponement: Markets remain open and unresolved until the match is completed and official result is published.
  • Match Cancellation (No Makeup): Remo win and Vitória win markets resolve to No; draw market resolves to Yes.
  • Delayed Official Statistics: If CBF does not publish official final statistics within 2 hours after match conclusion, resolution uses consensus of credible reporting sources.
  • Score Revisions After Resolution: Any revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution are not accounted for in determining the outcome.
Timing: Resolution occurs after the match concludes (90 minutes plus stoppage time). Official CBF statistics are the primary source; if unavailable within 2 hours post-match, credible reporting consensus is used. Markets settle based on the official final result as recognized by CBF at the time of resolution.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming Brazil Série A game, scheduled for Sunday, July 26, 2026 between Clube do Remo and EC Vitória.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the final result of the Remo vs Vitoria Brasileiro Serie A match after 90 minutes plus stoppage time, with extra time and penalties excluded from consideration. The match outcome will be one of three possibilities: Remo victory, Vitoria victory, or a tie. If the scheduled match is cancelled or postponed to more than two weeks away, the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with standard procedures.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates prediction market data across Polymarket and Kalshi for the Clube do Remo vs. EC Vitória match. Traders on both venues are pricing the likelihood of each team's victory, with real-time odds reflecting consensus expectations. The cross-platform view lets you compare how different prediction markets are valuing this matchup, revealing where the strongest conviction lies. Combined volume and price movements across venues provide a comprehensive snapshot of market sentiment leading up to kickoff.

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price outcomes differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and extract a margin, while prediction markets let traders directly stake capital on outcomes, with prices emerging from supply and demand. Prediction market odds often reflect sharper, more efficient pricing because traders face direct financial incentive to correct mispricings. However, sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news or injury reports. Comparing both sources can reveal valuable discrepancies and help you identify where market consensus diverges from traditional betting lines.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different prices on this market for several reasons. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, liquidity pools, and fee structures, which influence how quickly prices adjust to new information. Geographic restrictions, platform-specific rules, and variations in trading volume can also create temporary arbitrage opportunities. Additionally, one venue may have faster order flow or more active market makers, causing it to lead price discovery. These gaps typically narrow as informed traders exploit them, but they often persist due to friction costs and platform differences.

Key catalysts include team news such as injuries to star players, lineup announcements, or tactical changes that shift perceived win probability. Recent form, head-to-head records, and home-field advantage can all influence trader positioning. Weather conditions on match day and any late-breaking developments hours before kickoff often trigger sharp price moves. Social media sentiment and expert commentary may also sway retail traders. Professional bettors and syndicates typically enter closer to the match, potentially moving odds significantly as they deploy capital based on proprietary analysis.