TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Chicago C vs Cincinnati: 5th Inning Winner
kalshi

Chicago C vs Cincinnati: 5th Inning Winner

Volume:
$525

Tie 5th inning

 - Kalshi

Tie 5th inning - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 19, 2026

Closed: Sep 18, 8:15 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Tie 5th inning

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$19
N/A
N/A
$17
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Chicago C wins 5th inning

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$502
N/A
N/A
$502
Settled
No
kalshi

Cincinnati wins 5th inning

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$4
N/A
N/A
$4
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market focuses on determining which team will score more runs during a specific inning of an upcoming baseball game between Chicago and Cincinnati. It provides a way to bet on short-term performance within the game, highlighting the competitive nature of inning-by-inning scoring.

Kalshi

If Chicago C scores more runs in the 5th inning of the Chicago C vs Cincinnati professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 18, 2026 at 6:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If Cincinnati scores more runs in the 5th inning of the Chicago C vs Cincinnati professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 18, 2026 at 6:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If neither Chicago C nor Cincinnati scores more runs in the 5th inning of the Chicago C vs Cincinnati professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 18, 2026 at 6:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.