TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Charleston Southern vs Lindenwood: 1st Half Winner
kalshi

Charleston Southern vs Lindenwood: 1st Half Winner

Volume:
$1,461

Lindenwood wins 1st Half

 - Kalshi

Lindenwood wins 1st Half - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Aug 28, 2026

Closed: Aug 27, 8:38 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Lindenwood wins 1st Half

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$676
N/A
N/A
$676
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Tie 1st Half

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$476
N/A
N/A
$476
Settled
No
kalshi

Charleston Southern wins 1st Half

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$309
N/A
N/A
$309
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market tracks the outcome of the first half of a college football game between Charleston Southern and Lindenwood. It focuses solely on which team leads at halftime, or if the half ends in a tie, without considering the full game result. The resolution depends on the official scoring during the first 30 minutes of play.

Kalshi

If Lindenwood wins the 1st half of the Charleston Southern vs Lindenwood college football game originally scheduled for Aug 27, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. If Charleston Southern wins the 1st half of the Charleston Southern vs Lindenwood college football game originally scheduled for Aug 27, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. If neither team wins the 1st half of the Charleston Southern vs Lindenwood college football game originally scheduled for Aug 27, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.