TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$130,522,377

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,438,389,636

404,028

Markets across

30,214

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,681

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Cape Verde vs. Cameroon
polymarket
kalshi

Who will win Cape Verde vs. Cameroon?

Volume:
$24,831

Cameroon

 - Kalshi

Cameroon - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 2, 2026

Closed: Jul 2, 2:54 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Cameroon

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$10,849
N/A
N/A
$10,294
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Cape Verde

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$9,631
N/A
N/A
$6,449
Settled
No
polymarket

Cape Verde vs. Cameroon

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$4,350
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers a FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game between Cape Verde and Cameroon scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 1:00 PM EDT. Markets on Polymarket and Kalshi are tracking the winner of this professional matchup.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution logic is logically contradictory: both a Cameroon win and a Cape Verde win are specified to resolve to Yes, making the market unable to differentiate outcomes. Polymarket uses standard binary winner-take-all logic.Hero tip: This is a critical flaw in Kalshi's market specification. Do not trade on Kalshi until the contradiction is resolved. Polymarket's market is resolvable and should be the primary venue for this event.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary winner-take-all resolution with clear outcome mapping. Cape Verde win resolves to 'Cape Verde', Cameroon win resolves to 'Cameroon'. Postponement keeps market open; cancellation resolves 50-50. Final score includes overtime.
  • Kalshi: Contradictory specification: both 'If Cameroon wins...resolves to Yes' and 'If Cape Verde wins...resolves to Yes'. Both outcomes map to the same resolution state, making the market logically unresolvable and unable to distinguish between the two teams.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Africa game, scheduled for July 2 at 1:00PM ET: If the Cape Verde win, the market will resolve to "Cape Verde". If the Cameroon win, the market will resolve to "Cameroon". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the winner of the Cameroon vs Cape Verde professional FIBA World Cup Qualifiers basketball game scheduled for July 2, 2026 at 1:00 PM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes within two weeks. Should the game be cancelled and not played, or rescheduled beyond two weeks, the market resolves to a fair price for each team in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi operate on peer-to-peer trading rather than fixed-odds bookmaking. Sportsbooks set odds with built-in margins and adjust them to balance liability; prediction markets reflect live consensus from thousands of traders with real money at stake. This often produces sharper, more efficient pricing—especially in niche matchups where sportsbooks offer limited liquidity. However, prediction market odds can be more volatile intraday and may diverge from traditional sportsbooks during low-volume periods. Both reflect expected outcomes, but through fundamentally different mechanisms.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, fee structures, and regulatory frameworks that influence pricing. Polymarket typically draws larger volumes and may reflect broader consensus, while Kalshi may see specialized traders or different liquidity patterns. Arbitrage opportunities between platforms are limited by withdrawal friction and platform-specific rules, allowing price gaps to persist. Market depth, user base composition, and promotional activity also drive divergence. Savvy traders monitor both venues to identify mispricings and capitalize on temporary inefficiencies before equilibrium restores.

Team news—injuries to key players, lineup changes, or managerial decisions—often triggers sharp price swings. Recent form, head-to-head history, and qualification implications can shift trader sentiment significantly. Weather conditions on match day, venue factors, and late-breaking tactical announcements may also influence odds. Social media trends and expert commentary can amplify volatility, especially if a surprise narrative emerges. Close to kickoff, final team sheets and warm-up performance reports typically drive the largest repricing. Monitor sports media and platform activity closely for catalysts that reshape market conviction.