TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Bucheon FC 1995 vs. FC Seoul
polymarket
kalshi

What is the result of Bucheon FC 1995 vs. FC Seoul?

Volume:
$443,950

FC Seoul

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Kalshi

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 19, 2026

Closed: Jul 19, 6:30 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

FC Seoul

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$172,808
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Seoul

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$152,204
N/A
N/A
$107,721
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bucheon FC 1995

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$39,906
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Bucheon

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$32,113
N/A
N/A
$27,177
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$32,874
N/A
N/A
$22,609
Settled
No
polymarket

Draw (Bucheon FC 1995 vs. FC Seoul)

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$14,045
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Description

This event group covers a K League 1 soccer match between Bucheon FC 1995 and FC Seoul scheduled for July 19, 2026. Three markets across Polymarket and Kalshi assess the match outcome: whether Bucheon wins, whether Seoul wins, and whether the match ends in a draw. All markets resolve based on the result within 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket and Kalshi employ different market structures for the same three-outcome event. Polymarket uses three independent binary markets with asymmetric cancellation rules, while Kalshi uses three outcome-specific markets with undefined cancellation logic. This creates divergent settlement behavior in edge cases.Hero tip: The primary divergence risk is cancellation. On Polymarket, a canceled match with no makeup resolves the Draw market to Yes while Bucheon and Seoul markets resolve No. Kalshi does not specify cancellation behavior. Traders should clarify cancellation policy with each platform before match day and avoid assuming identical treatment across venues.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Three independent binary markets. Cancellation with no makeup: Bucheon Win = No, Draw = Yes, Seoul Win = No. Key quote: 'If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve No' (for Bucheon and Seoul) vs 'this market will resolve to Yes' (for Draw). Asymmetric cancellation creates a structural advantage for Draw holders.
  • Kalshi: Three outcome-specific markets (Bucheon Win, Seoul Win, Tie). Each resolves Yes if that outcome occurs after 90 minutes plus stoppage time. Cancellation logic is not explicitly stated. Key quote: 'If [outcome] is the result of the Bucheon vs Seoul professional Korea K League 1 soccer game originally scheduled for Jul 19, 2026 after 90 minutes plus stoppage time, then the market resolves to Yes.' No mention of canceled-game handling creates ambiguity.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming K-League game, scheduled for Sunday, July 19, 2026 between Bucheon FC 1995 and FC Seoul.

Kalshi

Resolution is based on the final result of the Bucheon vs Seoul professional Korea K League 1 soccer game originally scheduled for July 19, 2026, evaluated after 90 minutes plus stoppage time (excluding extra time or penalties). The event encompasses three possible outcomes: a Bucheon victory, a Seoul victory, or a tie. If the game ends in a draw, the Tie market resolves to Yes. Should the game be cancelled or rescheduled to more than two weeks after the original date, the market will resolve to a fair price in accordance with established rules.

Frequently asked questions

This dashboard aggregates prediction market data across Polymarket and Kalshi for the Bucheon FC 1995 vs. FC Seoul match. Both platforms allow traders to buy and sell shares tied to the outcome of this fixture, with prices reflecting real-time consensus on which team is favored. The cross-platform view lets you compare how each venue prices the same event, revealing where market participants see the strongest conviction. Total volume across both platforms provides insight into trader interest and confidence in the match outcome.

Prediction markets and traditional sportsbooks price outcomes differently. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets derive prices from direct trader supply and demand. This market's odds reflect what thousands of independent traders believe will happen, often incorporating information faster than sportsbooks adjust their lines. Comparing the two can reveal where public perception diverges from professional oddsmakers, though both should be viewed as estimates rather than certainties.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts different trader demographics, fee structures, and liquidity pools, which can cause temporary price gaps. Polymarket and Kalshi may also have slightly different user interfaces or promotional incentives that influence order flow. Additionally, traders on one venue may react to news or team updates faster than the other, creating arbitrage opportunities. These differences typically narrow as informed traders exploit pricing gaps, but they can persist if one platform has lower volume or different user behavior patterns.

Key player injuries, lineup announcements, or recent team form could shift trader sentiment significantly. Head-to-head history and home-field advantage also influence pricing. Weather conditions on match day, last-minute roster changes, or managerial decisions may prompt sharp traders to adjust positions. Media coverage and betting trends on external sportsbooks can also signal shifting expectations. As the fixture date approaches, any breaking news about team preparation or player availability will likely trigger repricing across both platforms.