TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$141,541,542
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,440,096,988
406,065
Markets across
30,522
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,692
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 13, 8:04 PM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks the total number of corner kicks expected during the Brazil vs. Morocco FIFA World Cup match. Across Limitless, Kalshi, and Polymarket, the aggregated consensus shows 100.0% probability on the leading outcome, with resolution determined by official FIFA records. The match is scheduled for June 13, 2026, with the betting period closing on June 14, 2026, so monitor team lineups and tactical formations announced in the days leading up to kickoff, as these will significantly influence corner frequency.
Total corners markets for the FIFA World Cup game between Brazil and Morocco, scheduled for June 13 at 6:00 PM ET.
Resolution is based on corner kick counts for Brazil and Morocco during the Brazil vs Morocco FIFA World Cup match scheduled for June 13, 2026, measured throughout the entire game including regulation, stoppage time, and any extra time periods. Brazil's corner thresholds are 6+, 8+, and 10+ corners, while Morocco's thresholds are 4+, 6+, and 8+ corners. If the game is cancelled or rescheduled to more than two weeks away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with the rules.
This market will resolve to "YES" if the combined total number of corners taken by Brazil and Morocco is 11 or higher during regular time (90 minutes plus stoppage time only) in the World Cup match scheduled for June 13, 2026, 22:00 UTC. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "NO." If the match is canceled after it starts, this market will resolve based on official data recorded up to that point. If the match is canceled entirely before it starts or postponed/rescheduled to a restart date later than August 13, 2026, 23:59 UTC, this market will resolve to "NO."
Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Differences between Polymarket and Kalshi can stem from distinct user bases, liquidity depth, fee structures, and market-making incentives. Polymarket may attract different trader demographics or have tighter spreads in certain outcome ranges, while Kalshi may see concentrated volume on one side. Arbitrage opportunities and timing lags between platforms can also cause temporary price gaps. These divergences typically narrow as resolution approaches and informed traders exploit mispricings.
Key catalysts include team lineup announcements, injury updates to key players, recent corner trends for both sides, and tactical shifts. Brazil and Morocco's historical corner rates, head-to-head patterns, and playing style will influence expectations. Weather conditions, referee tendencies, and tournament context also matter. As match day approaches, late-breaking news—such as formation changes or player availability—can trigger sharp repricing across Polymarket and Kalshi.