TOTAL VOLUME:
$134b
24H VOL:
$107,351,958
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,416,970,024
400,720
Markets across
30,097
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,633
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jun 13, 6:38 PM EST
Kalshi
This market on Kalshi tracks whether Endrick scores at least one goal during the Brazil vs Morocco FIFA World Cup match. Endrick to score 1+ goals currently stands at 80.0% on Kalshi. Resolution is determined by official FIFA World Cup records, counting all goals scored during regulation, stoppage time, and any extra time periods. Watch for the match kickoff on June 13, 2026, which will determine the final outcome.
This event resolves based on whether designated players from Brazil and Morocco score goals during the entire Brazil vs Morocco FIFA World Cup soccer game scheduled for June 13, 2026. The event encompasses all play during regulation time, stoppage time, and any extra time periods. Each player has one or more goal thresholds tracked (1+, 2+, or 3+ goals). For each player and threshold, resolution occurs once that player enters the game, with settlement based on their recorded goal count. If a player is listed as active but never enters the match, the market settles to the last fair market price established before the game began. Brazilian players tracked include Bruno Guimaraes (1+, 2+), Gabriel Magalhaes (1+), Marquinhos (1+), Matheus Cunha (1+, 2+), Raphinha (1+, 2+), and Vinicius Junior (1+, 2+, 3+). Moroccan players tracked include Achraf Hakimi (1+), Ayoub El Kaabi (1+, 2+), Bilal El Khannouss (1+), and Brahim Diaz (1+, 2+).
Prediction market odds on this market often diverge from traditional sportsbook lines because they reflect real-time trader positioning rather than fixed bookmaker margins. Sportsbooks typically adjust odds to balance liability, while prediction markets price outcomes based on collective belief among active participants. This market may show different implied probabilities for each goalscorer than you'd find at a conventional sportsbook, especially as new information surfaces or trading volume concentrates on specific players. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd sees value that bookmakers have missed, or where consensus differs between retail bettors and prediction market professionals.
On Kalshi, this market is priced through continuous order-book matching, where traders submit bids and asks for each goalscorer contract and the platform executes trades at the best available price. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Each player's contract trades independently, so the price of one goalscorer outcome does not mechanically constrain another—allowing for rich price discovery across the full roster. As match conditions change, new information emerges, or trading interest shifts, prices adjust fluidly to reflect updated expectations. This mechanism ensures that the odds you see reflect genuine supply and demand from active traders rather than a static model.
This market resolves around Jun 14, 2026, once the Brazil vs Morocco match concludes and the final goalscorer data is verified against credible public sources. The outcome is determined by which player, if any, scores during the match. Contracts for players who do not score expire worthless, while the contract for the actual goalscorer settles at full value. If multiple players score, each qualifying contract settles independently. Resolution occurs after official match records are confirmed and any video review or dispute processes are complete.
Key catalysts include team lineup announcements, injury reports, and pre-match press conferences that reveal tactical setup or player availability. Weather conditions, venue details, and recent form updates can shift trader conviction about which players are likely to be in the starting eleven or to see significant minutes. Live match events—such as early goals, red cards, or substitutions—will trigger sharp repricing as the probability of each goalscorer changes in real time. Additionally, betting syndicates or sharp traders entering with large positions can move prices significantly, signaling information asymmetry or contrarian views on undervalued or overvalued outcomes.