TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson
polymarket

Who will win the Bastad match between Arango and Nilsson?

Volume:
$47,278

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson

 - Polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 6, 2026

Closed: Jul 13, 4:00 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$46,592
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 1 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$393
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set Handicap +/-1.5

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
$240
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Match O/U 21.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$8
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 1 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 2 O/U 8.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Total Sets: O/U 2.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Match O/U 22.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 1 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 2 O/U 9.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 1 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Match O/U 23.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 2 O/U 10.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Completed Match

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.8¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set 2 Winner

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.1¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Bastad: Emiliana Arango vs Lea Nilsson Set Handicap +/-1.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 16

Description

This market refers to the tennis match between Emiliana Arango and Lea Nilsson in the Bastad, originally scheduled for July 6, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Emiliana Arango' if Emiliana Arango advances against Lea Nilsson. This market will resolve to 'Lea Nilsson' if Lea Nilsson advances against Emiliana Arango. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Polymarket

This market refers to the tennis match between Emiliana Arango and Lea Nilsson in the Bastad, originally scheduled for July 6, 2026 at 4:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Emiliana Arango' if Emiliana Arango advances against Lea Nilsson. This market will resolve to 'Lea Nilsson' if Lea Nilsson advances against Emiliana Arango. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket, the dashboard for the Arango vs Nilsson tennis match displays real-time odds and price movements as traders buy and sell shares tied to the match outcome. You can monitor how market sentiment shifts throughout the trading period, track cumulative volume, and observe the probability implied by current prices. The interface shows historical price data, allowing you to see how confidence in each player has evolved. This transparency helps traders identify patterns and make informed decisions based on live market activity leading up to the event.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set odds to balance liability and extract margin, while prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs through continuous price discovery. This market may show different implied probabilities than traditional sports betting sites, especially as new information emerges. Comparing the two can reveal where the crowd on Polymarket disagrees with professional oddsmakers, though both sources provide valuable perspectives on the likely outcome.

On Polymarket, traders set prices by buying and selling outcome shares in a continuous order-book environment. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the aggregate belief of all active traders at any given moment. As new information surfaces—such as player form, injury reports, or head-to-head history—traders adjust their positions, moving prices up or down. This dynamic pricing mechanism ensures the market continuously incorporates available evidence, with the final price serving as a crowd-sourced probability estimate.

This market resolves around Jul 13, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome will reflect which player wins the match at the Bastad tournament. Resolution occurs after the event is officially confirmed, ensuring accuracy and fairness for all traders. Until that point, prices may fluctuate based on pre-match developments, player news, and market sentiment.

Several factors could shift prices before the match takes place. Injury announcements or fitness updates for either player would likely trigger sharp moves, as would recent tournament performance or head-to-head record releases. Changes in court conditions, weather forecasts, or draw-related news may also influence trader positioning. Media coverage highlighting one player's form or psychological edge could sway sentiment. Additionally, betting activity from professional syndicates or notable traders entering the market can create sudden momentum, so monitoring these catalysts helps anticipate price swings.