TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$113,466,932

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,423,222,590

402,751

Markets across

30,217

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,632

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
BakS eSports vs. Gatorian
kalshi

What is the result of BakS eSports vs. Gatorian?

Volume:
$18,100

BakS eSports

 - Kalshi

BakS eSports - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 5, 2026

Closed: Jul 5, 1:29 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

BakS eSports

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$8,325
N/A
N/A
$4,790
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Gatorian

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$9,775
N/A
N/A
$5,156
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

BakS eSports and Gatorian face off in a Counter-Strike 2 match during the CCT Europe Contenders #6 2026 tournament. The match is scheduled for July 5, 2026 at 11:30 AM EDT. Resolution is determined by which team wins this competitive esports contest.

Kalshi

This event covers the CCT Europe Contenders #6 2026 CS2 match between BakS eSports and Gatorian scheduled for July 5, 2026 at 11:30 AM EDT. The market resolves to Yes for whichever team wins the match. Each team has a corresponding market outcome, and exactly one will resolve affirmatively based on the match result.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for this matchup displays real-time odds and historical price movements as traders position themselves ahead of the event. You can monitor the current implied probability, 24-hour trading volume of $9,786, and cumulative volume of $18,100 to gauge market interest and conviction. The interface updates continuously, allowing you to track how sentiment shifts as new information emerges about team performance, roster changes, or other competitive factors. This live data helps you understand both the consensus expectation and the intensity of trading activity around the outcome.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and protect their margin, while prediction markets like this one are driven purely by trader conviction and information flow. Traders here are motivated by profit rather than volume management, which can lead to sharper pricing on emerging information. Over time, prediction markets have demonstrated accuracy in capturing ground truth, especially when liquidity is robust. Comparing this market's odds to major sportsbooks can reveal where informed traders see value or disagreement.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order-book mechanism where buyers and sellers post bids and offers in real time. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price you see reflects the marginal trade—the last executed transaction—and the spread between the best bid and best offer shows the cost of immediacy. As new information arrives or trader sentiment shifts, the order book adjusts dynamically. Deeper liquidity typically narrows the spread and improves price discovery, making the implied probability more reliable as a consensus estimate of the outcome.

This market resolves around Jul 5, 2026, once the event concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome will be confirmed based on the official match result, ensuring clarity and finality for all traders. Until that point, prices will fluctuate as new developments—such as team announcements, practice results, or expert commentary—influence trader expectations. Resolution is binary and definitive, so positions held through expiration will settle according to the verified outcome.

Several catalysts could shift prices significantly before Jul 5, 2026. Roster announcements, player injuries, or trades involving key competitors would likely trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, scrim performances, or public statements from team leadership can also sway trader sentiment. Meta shifts in the game itself—balance patches or map rotations—may alter competitive dynamics and perceived matchup strength. Media coverage, analyst predictions, and community sentiment can amplify or dampen conviction. Watch for any official statements or credible reporting that changes the information set available to traders.