TOTAL VOLUME:
$134.1b
24H VOL:
$133,388,117
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,388,728,490
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,436,095,462
405,232
Markets across
30,526
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,693
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
39%
VS.
Kalshi:
61%
Closed: Jul 5, 9:00 AM EST
Polymarket
This audit reveals a critical data integrity failure: the source data conflates two entirely separate sporting events under a single group name. Polymarket contains 24 F1 Austrian Grand Prix podium finish markets (scheduled June 28, 2026), while Kalshi contains 37 NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series markets for the 2026 United Rentals Driven to Serve 250. These are different sports, different series, different drivers, and different events with no logical connection.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the listed driver finishes within the top three positions in the official "Final Classification" for the F1 Austrian Grand Prix, scheduled for Jun 28, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.” The "Final Classification" is published by the FIA following the conclusion of the race and includes any applied time penalties and official adjustments. It is typically released 30-60 minutes after the race ends. Disqualifications or changes made after the publication of the "Final Classification" will not affect market resolution. The timing of the podium ceremony does not determine the result for this market — only the FIA's published classification will be used to resolve this market. If the Austrian Grand Prix is postponed, this market will remain open until the event has been completed. If the Austrian Grand Prix is permanently canceled, this market will resolve 50-50.
Each market resolves to Yes if the corresponding driver finishes in the top 3 positions in the Main Event at the 2026 NASCAR United Rentals Driven to Serve 250. Resolution is based on final official NASCAR race results posted after the event concludes, not on provisional results.
Polymarket and Kalshi may quote different implied probabilities for the same driver podium outcome due to several factors. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform attracts distinct trader demographics, regulatory frameworks, and fee structures that influence how participants price risk. Liquidity depth varies between venues, so a large trade on one platform may move the price more sharply than on another. Settlement rules, withdrawal policies, and platform reputation also shape trader behavior and confidence. Arbitrage opportunities sometimes emerge when spreads widen, though transaction costs and withdrawal friction typically prevent perfect convergence. Monitoring both venues reveals which market is pricing the outcome more efficiently.