TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Atlanta vs Chicago C: 3rd Inning Winner
kalshi

Atlanta vs Chicago C: 3rd Inning Winner

Volume:
$40

Chicago C wins 3rd inning

 - Kalshi

Chicago C wins 3rd inning - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 16, 2026

Closed: Sep 15, 8:35 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Chicago C wins 3rd inning

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$39
N/A
N/A
$39
Settled
No
kalshi

Atlanta wins 3rd inning

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1
N/A
N/A
$1
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie 3rd inning

View
N/A
N/A
100¢
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 3

Description

This market focuses on determining which team will score more runs in a specific inning of an upcoming baseball game between Atlanta and Chicago. It provides a way to speculate on short-term performance during the game. The outcome depends solely on the runs scored by each team during that inning.

Kalshi

If Atlanta scores more runs in the 3rd inning of the Atlanta vs Chicago C professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 15, 2026 at 7:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If Chicago C scores more runs in the 3rd inning of the Atlanta vs Chicago C professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 15, 2026 at 7:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes. If neither Atlanta nor Chicago C scores more runs in the 3rd inning of the Atlanta vs Chicago C professional baseball game originally scheduled for Sep 15, 2026 at 7:40 PM EDT, then the market resolves to Yes.