TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$103,397,351

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,410,176,180

399,592

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,622

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Arkansas vs Utah: 1st Half Total
kalshi

What is the result of Arkansas vs Utah?

Volume:
$141,071

Over 27.5 1H points scored

 - Kalshi

Over 27.5 1H points scored - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Sep 13, 2026

Closed: Sep 13, 12:07 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Over 27.5 1H points scored

View
100%
48%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$65,012
N/A
N/A
$39,821
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 28.5 1H points scored

100%
55%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$24,985
N/A
N/A
$15,363
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 23.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$15,730
N/A
N/A
$9,761
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 30.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$9,313
N/A
N/A
$7,027
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 19.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$7,836
N/A
N/A
$6,385
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 20.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$5,843
N/A
N/A
$3,996
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 2.5 1H points scored

100%
5%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$2,534
N/A
N/A
$2,534
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 16.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,109
N/A
N/A
$1,109
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 13.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$858
N/A
N/A
$858
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 6.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$545
N/A
N/A
$545
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 9.5 1H points scored

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$537
N/A
N/A
$537
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 34.5 1H points scored

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$3,759
N/A
N/A
$3,670
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 37.5 1H points scored

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1,466
N/A
N/A
$1,018
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 44.5 1H points scored

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$816
N/A
N/A
$816
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 41.5 1H points scored

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$728
N/A
N/A
$728
Settled
No
Total markets: 15

Description

This set of markets tracks the total points scored by both teams in the first half of an upcoming college football game. Each market has a different threshold for the total points, determining whether the outcome is considered 'high-scoring' for that specific threshold.

Kalshi

All markets resolve based on the total points scored by both teams during the first half of the Arkansas vs Utah college football game scheduled for September 12, 2026. For each market, if the combined score exceeds the specified threshold (e.g., 2.5, 6.5, 9.5 points, etc.), the market resolves to 'Yes'; otherwise, it resolves to 'No'. If the game is postponed but commences within 48 hours of the original start time, the markets remain active and resolve according to the final official score. If the game does not start within the 48-hour window, all markets resolve to a fair price, ensuring equitable treatment for all participants regardless of the specific threshold being wagered upon.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Arkansas vs Utah 1st half market provides a real-time view of how traders are pricing the likelihood of different outcomes for the total points scored in the first half. You can see the current odds, the price history charting how those odds have changed over time, and the 24-hour trading volume, which is currently $135,069. The total volume traded on this market is $141,071, indicating the level of interest from the prediction community. This allows you to gauge market sentiment and track how it evolves leading up to the game.

Typically, prediction market odds reflect the wisdom of the crowd and can differ from those offered by sportsbooks. Sportsbooks set their lines to balance action and ensure profit, often incorporating a margin for themselves. This market, however, is driven by individuals willing to put their capital behind their beliefs, potentially leading to more accurate probabilities, especially as the event approaches. Discrepancies can arise due to differing information, biases, or simply the dynamics of how each venue operates. It’s common to see prediction markets move faster to incorporate new information than traditional sportsbooks.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous double auction, meaning traders buy and sell contracts representing different possible outcomes for the 1st half total. The price of each contract reflects the probability of that outcome occurring, as perceived by the market participants. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. As more traders participate and new information becomes available, the prices adjust dynamically, providing a real-time assessment of the expected result. The market isn't based on a fixed set of odds but rather on the collective judgment of those trading contracts.

This market resolves around Sep 13, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The final score of the first half between Arkansas and Utah will be used to determine whether the total points scored fall above or below the relevant thresholds defined by the contracts traded on Kalshi. The resolution will be based on official game statistics, ensuring a transparent and objective determination of the result. Traders will then be paid out based on whether their predictions aligned with the actual outcome.

Several factors could influence the price movement of this market. Any news regarding injuries to key players on either the Arkansas or Utah teams would likely have a significant impact. Changes in weather forecasts, particularly if they suggest conditions unfavorable for high-scoring games, could also shift the market. Late-breaking news about team strategies or coaching decisions might also cause adjustments. Finally, as the game draws closer, large trading volume from informed participants could drive price fluctuations, reflecting their assessment of the likely outcome.