TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Anastasia Potapova vs Suzan Lamens: Set 2 Winner
kalshi

Anastasia Potapova vs Suzan Lamens: Set 2 Winner

Volume:
$5,163

Anastasia Potapova

 - Kalshi

Anastasia Potapova - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 10, 2026

Closed: Jun 10, 8:11 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Anastasia Potapova

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$3,809
N/A
N/A
$2,905
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Suzan Lamens

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1,355
N/A
N/A
$1,175
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

Two professional tennis players compete in the second set of a Round of 32 match at the 2026 WTA S-Hertogenbosch tournament.

Frequently asked questions

The PredictionHero dashboard tracks real-time odds and trading activity for the Anastasia Potapova vs Suzan Lamens Set 2 Winner market on Kalshi. You can monitor live probability estimates for each outcome, view 24-hour volume of $5,030, and observe price movements as traders adjust their positions. The dashboard displays historical odds data, allowing you to see how market sentiment has evolved leading up to the match. This single-venue view provides transparency into how prediction market participants are pricing the likelihood of each player winning the second set.

Prediction market odds on Kalshi often diverge from traditional sportsbook odds because they reflect real-time trader sentiment rather than fixed bookmaker lines. Sportsbooks typically adjust odds to balance liability, while prediction markets aggregate decentralized participant beliefs continuously. For the Potapova vs Lamens Set 2 Winner event, comparing Kalshi probabilities to major sportsbooks can reveal whether the market is pricing either player as undervalued or overvalued relative to conventional betting consensus. These differences can highlight unique trading opportunities for informed participants.

On Kalshi, the Anastasia Potapova vs Suzan Lamens Set 2 Winner market is priced as a binary contract reflecting the probability of each outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Traders buy and sell shares corresponding to their belief in whether Potapova or Lamens will win the second set, with contract prices ranging from $0 to $1 and representing implied probability. The market price adjusts dynamically based on order flow and trading volume, allowing participants to enter or exit positions at any time before the resolution deadline. Kalshi's transparent pricing mechanism enables traders to see real-time bid-ask spreads and execute trades at competitive rates.

The Anastasia Potapova vs Suzan Lamens Set 2 Winner market resolves on Jun 8, 2026, coinciding with the completion of the second set in their match. The outcome is determined by the official result recorded by the tournament organizers and verified through reliable sports data sources. Once the second set concludes and the winner is confirmed, the market settles automatically, with winning positions paid out at full value and losing positions expiring worthless. Traders should monitor match schedules and live updates to track progress toward resolution.

Several factors could shift market odds for the Potapova vs Lamens Set 2 Winner outcome. First-set results will provide crucial momentum signals, as winning the opening set often influences second-set performance and trader confidence. Player injuries, weather conditions, or court surface changes announced before or during the match could alter perceived advantage. Real-time match developments—such as service breaks, set point situations, or visible fatigue—will drive active trading and repricing. Media commentary, betting syndicate activity, and shifts in public perception also influence prediction market prices as new information emerges closer to the second set's conclusion.