TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$133,388,117

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,436,095,462

405,232

Markets across

30,526

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,693

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Anastasia Gasanova vs Emiliana Arango: Set 2 Winner
kalshi

Who will win Set 2: Gasanova vs Arango?

Volume:
$2,308

Anastasia Gasanova

 - Kalshi

Anastasia Gasanova - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 29, 2026

Closed: Jun 29, 3:31 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Anastasia Gasanova

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$564
N/A
N/A
$471
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Emiliana Arango

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1,744
N/A
N/A
$1,606
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

Anastasia Gasanova and Emiliana Arango compete in the second set of their 2026 Wimbledon Women's Singles Round of 128 match on June 29. The market resolves based on which player wins that second set.

Kalshi

This event covers the second set of the Anastasia Gasanova vs Emiliana Arango professional tennis match in the 2026 Wimbledon Women Singles Round of 128. Resolution is determined by which player wins set 2. If the match does not occur before play begins due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to a fair price. If the match is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are resolved to Fair Market Price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the Gasanova vs Arango Set 2 winner market dashboard displays real-time odds for who will win the second set of this tennis match. The interface tracks the current implied probability for each outcome, historical price movements, and trading activity. You can monitor how sentiment shifts as match conditions evolve, review cumulative volume of $2,308, and observe 24-hour trading intensity at $2,308. This live data helps traders assess market confidence and identify potential value before the set concludes.

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price tennis outcomes differently. Sportsbooks apply fixed margins and employ professional oddsmakers; prediction markets aggregate trader beliefs through continuous order flow. This market reflects real-time consensus from active participants rather than a bookmaker's static line. Comparing this market's implied probability to major sportsbook spreads can reveal where traders and bookmakers diverge on Set 2 expectations. Discrepancies often signal either sharp market insight or temporary inefficiency worth investigating before resolution.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through an order-book mechanism where traders buy and sell shares representing each outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current odds reflect the latest matched trades and pending orders; as new information emerges—injuries, momentum shifts, or court conditions—the price adjusts continuously. Traders holding shares profit if their outcome occurs; those on the wrong side realize losses. This dynamic pricing model ensures the market stays responsive to real-world developments throughout the match.

This market resolves around Jun 29, 2026, once the second set of the Gasanova vs Arango match concludes. The outcome is determined by verified reporting of who won Set 2, confirmed against credible public sources covering professional tennis. Traders holding shares in the correct outcome receive their payout; incorrect positions expire worthless. Resolution timing depends on match scheduling and completion; any delays in the match itself will push resolution forward accordingly.

Several factors can shift odds before Set 2 concludes. Early match performance in Set 1 often signals momentum and confidence, moving prices sharply. Player injuries, fatigue, or tactical adjustments announced during changeovers influence trader positioning. Court conditions—surface speed, weather, lighting—can favor one competitor and trigger repricing. Betting news from major sportsbooks or professional commentary may also sway sentiment. Real-time score updates and serve statistics throughout Set 2 itself will drive the most dramatic moves as the outcome becomes clearer.