TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.1b

24H VOL:

$141,541,542

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,440,096,988

406,065

Markets across

30,522

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,692

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Amaru Gaming vs. Red Hot Chili Pibble: Map 1
kalshi

Amaru Gaming vs. Red Hot Chili Pibble: Map 1

Volume:
$1,249

Amaru Gaming

 - Kalshi

Amaru Gaming - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 15, 2026

Closed: Jun 15, 5:40 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Amaru Gaming

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$1,089
N/A
N/A
$1,089
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Red Hot Chili Pibble

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$160
N/A
N/A
$160
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

Amaru Gaming and Red Hot Chili Pibble compete in Map 1 of The International South America Closed Qualifier 2026 Dota 2 match scheduled for June 15, 2026. The outcome depends on which team successfully defeats their opponent in this opening map of the series.

Kalshi

This event resolves based on the winner of Map 1 in the scheduled Dota 2 match between Amaru Gaming and Red Hot Chili Pibble at The International South America Closed Qualifier 2026, originally scheduled for June 15, 2026 at 4:00 PM EDT. Resolution occurs when either Amaru Gaming or Red Hot Chili Pibble achieves victory on Map 1 of this qualifier match.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for this prediction market displays real-time odds and historical price movement for the Amaru Gaming vs. Red Hot Chili Pibble Map 1 match. Traders can monitor current implied probabilities, track how sentiment has shifted since market creation, and review 24-hour trading activity. The interface shows the leading outcome alongside its current probability, allowing participants to assess market consensus at a glance. This transparency helps traders make informed decisions about whether to buy, sell, or hold their positions as new information emerges.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different mechanisms. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and manage risk, while prediction markets like this one are priced by traders who profit from accurate forecasting. Prediction markets typically incorporate real-time information more efficiently and can adjust faster to breaking news. However, sportsbook odds may reflect sharper professional betting syndicates. Comparing the two reveals whether the crowd on this market is more or less confident than traditional oddsmakers about the outcome.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through continuous order-book trading, where buyers and sellers submit bids and asks that determine the current probability. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The leading outcome currently reflects trader sentiment, with prices updating in real time as new positions are placed. Kalshi's mechanism rewards accurate forecasters and penalizes poor predictions, creating incentives for participants to incorporate all available information. This dynamic pricing model ensures the market remains responsive to developments and reflects the collective judgment of active traders.

This market resolves around Jun 16, 2026, once the match concludes and the result is verifiable from credible public reporting. The outcome will be confirmed based on the official result of Map 1 in the Amaru Gaming versus Red Hot Chili Pibble contest. Traders should monitor official esports channels and team announcements as the resolution date approaches to stay informed about any scheduling changes or postponements that could affect timing.

Several factors could shift odds before resolution. Team roster changes, player injuries, or unexpected roster swaps may alter perceived strength. Recent tournament performance, scrim results, or public statements from coaches and players can influence trader confidence. Meta shifts in the game itself—balance patches or map updates—could favor one squad over the other. Betting patterns and large trades by sophisticated participants often signal new information. Additionally, pre-match interviews and official team preparation announcements may prompt repricing as the event date draws closer.