TOTAL VOLUME:

$134b

24H VOL:

$107,351,958

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,416,970,024

400,720

Markets across

30,097

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,633

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Amanda Anisimova vs Lina Gjorcheska: Set 1 Winner
kalshi

Who will win set 1: Anisimova vs Gjorcheska?

Volume:
$3,608

Amanda Anisimova

 - Kalshi

Amanda Anisimova - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 30, 2026

Closed: Jun 30, 6:53 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Amanda Anisimova

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$3,296
N/A
N/A
$3,205
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Lina Gjorcheska

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$312
N/A
N/A
$312
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

This market tracks the outcome of the first set in the professional tennis match between Amanda Anisimova and Lina Gjorcheska at the 2026 Wimbledon Women's Singles Round of 128 on June 30. The winner of set 1 will determine the market resolution.

Kalshi

The market resolves based on which player wins set 1 in the Amanda Anisimova vs Lina Gjorcheska match at 2026 Wimbledon Women's Singles Round of 128. If the match does not occur before it starts due to injury, walkover, forfeiture, or cancellation, the market resolves to fair price. If postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled match concludes within two weeks. If a player retires, markets that can be unconditionally settled based on completed play resolve accordingly; those that cannot are resolved to fair market price at the Exchange's discretion.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the Anisimova vs Gjorcheska Set 1 market dashboard tracks real-time odds and price movements for predicting who will win the opening set of this tennis matchup. The interface displays current market pricing, historical price charts, and 24-hour trading volume to help traders monitor sentiment and liquidity. This dashboard gives you a live snapshot of how the prediction market is valuing each outcome, updated continuously as new trades execute. You can use these data points to assess whether odds align with your own assessment of the match.

Prediction market odds and sportsbook odds often diverge because they reflect different participant bases and incentive structures. Sportsbooks set lines to balance action and lock in profit margins, while prediction markets like this one aggregate the collective beliefs of traders risking real capital. Prediction markets can sometimes offer sharper, more efficient pricing because traders have direct financial exposure to accuracy. However, sportsbooks may move faster on breaking news or injury reports. Comparing the two can reveal where consensus differs and highlight potential value in either venue.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through continuous order-book trading, where buyers and sellers submit bids and asks for each outcome. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price of each outcome reflects the marginal trade—the last executed transaction—and moves as new orders arrive. Traders can place limit orders to wait for their target price or market orders to execute immediately at the current ask or bid. This mechanism ensures prices adjust dynamically based on real-time supply and demand, making the market responsive to new information about player form, conditions, and public sentiment.

This market resolves around Jun 30, 2026, once the Anisimova vs Gjorcheska match concludes and the first-set winner is verified against credible public sources. The outcome is determined by official match records and confirmed through established sports reporting. Until that point, the market remains open for trading, and prices may shift as the event approaches or as new information emerges. Resolution is final once the set result is official.

Several factors could shift odds before the match begins. Injury announcements or withdrawal news involving either player would trigger sharp repricing. Recent tournament results, head-to-head records, and surface-specific performance data often influence trader positioning. Court conditions, weather forecasts, and player fatigue from prior rounds can also sway sentiment. Media coverage highlighting form or momentum may prompt retail traders to adjust positions. Closer to match time, warm-up results and official lineups finalize expectations. Trading volume typically spikes in the final hours as bettors lock in their views before the set starts.