TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
AHL: Cleveland Monsters vs. Grand Rapids Griffins
polymarket
kalshi

AHL: Cleveland Monsters vs. Grand Rapids Griffins

Volume:
$4,596

Grand Rapids Griffins

 - Kalshi

Grand Rapids Griffins - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Apr 18, 2026

Closed: Feb 18, 10:00 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Grand Rapids Griffins

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
-$9,890
$1,289
N/A
N/A
$1,225
Settled
Yes
polymarket

AHL: Cleveland Monsters vs. Grand Rapids Griffins

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,846
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Cleveland Monsters

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
-$5,736
$461
N/A
N/A
$411
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This event group covers a single AHL (American Hockey League) matchup between the Cleveland Monsters and Grand Rapids Griffins scheduled for February 18, 2026. Markets on Polymarket and Kalshi are pricing the outcome of this game, with resolution tied to the final score including overtime and shootout results.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi's resolution criteria contains a logical contradiction: both mutually exclusive outcomes (Cleveland Monsters win AND Grand Rapids Griffins win) are mapped to the same resolution state (Yes), making the market fundamentally unresolvable as drafted.Hero tip: This is a critical data integrity failure on Kalshi. The market cannot logically resolve to Yes for both teams winning. Before trading, demand clarification: should the losing team outcome resolve to No, or is this a drafting error? Polymarket's binary structure is sound and resolvable.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Binary outcome market with mutually exclusive resolution paths. Resolves to team name of winner based on final score including overtime and shootouts. One goal added to shootout winner's score for resolution purposes. Handles postponement (market stays open) and cancellation (50-50 split) explicitly.
  • Kalshi: Defective resolution logic: states both 'If Cleveland Monsters wins...resolves to Yes' AND 'If Grand Rapids Griffins wins...resolves to Yes.' Since only one team can win, both mutually exclusive outcomes cannot both resolve to Yes. This is a logical contradiction that prevents proper settlement.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.