TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$126,324,530

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,434,646,834

406,019

Markets across

30,401

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,689

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
AG.AL International vs. Global Esports
kalshi

What is the result of AG.AL International vs. Global Esports?

Volume:
$105,870

AG.AL International

 - Kalshi

AG.AL International - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jul 5, 2026

Closed: Jul 5, 9:19 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

AG.AL International

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$43,901
N/A
N/A
$29,253
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Global Esports

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$61,969
N/A
N/A
$41,547
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

AG.AL International and Global Esports face off in a Valorant match at the Esports World Cup 2026 on July 5, 2026. The winner of this match advances in the tournament.

Kalshi

Resolution is determined by the overall outcome of the scheduled Valorant match between AG.AL International and Global Esports at the Esports World Cup 2026, originally scheduled for July 5, 2026 at 7:00 AM EDT. The market resolves to Yes for whichever team wins the match.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the AG.AL International vs. Global Esports matchup displays real-time odds, historical price movements, and trading activity. Traders use this interface to buy and sell shares reflecting their predictions about the match outcome. The platform aggregates all trading data to show current market sentiment, allowing you to monitor how odds shift as new information emerges. Volume metrics and price history help you understand liquidity and conviction levels among participants tracking this esports event.

Prediction markets and sportsbooks price events differently because they operate under distinct mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and manage risk, while prediction markets derive prices from continuous trader supply and demand. This market reflects aggregated trader beliefs rather than a bookmaker's margin-adjusted line. Comparing this market's odds to traditional sportsbook prices can reveal where consensus diverges, though each venue serves different purposes and may price in different information sets or time horizons.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through an order-book mechanism where traders continuously buy and sell shares at their chosen prices. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The current bid-ask spread reflects the gap between buyers and sellers, and the midpoint typically represents the market's central estimate. As new trades execute, the price updates in real time. Deeper liquidity narrows spreads and makes it easier to enter or exit positions at fair value, while thinner liquidity can widen the gap between buy and sell prices.

This market resolves around Jul 5, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The resolution hinges on the final result of the matchup between the two teams. Traders holding shares in the winning outcome receive their payout, while incorrect predictions expire worthless. Until that date, prices will fluctuate based on team news, roster changes, recent performance, and other factors that influence perceived likelihood of victory.

Several catalysts could shift odds before Jul 5, 2026. Roster announcements, player injuries, or trades involving key competitors may alter perceived strength. Recent match results and head-to-head records provide concrete performance data that traders monitor closely. Coaching changes, team statements, or strategic shifts can signal confidence or concern. Betting trends from other venues and community sentiment on esports forums also influence trader positioning. Any credible reporting on team preparation or external circumstances affecting either competitor could trigger rapid repricing.