TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.5b

24H VOL:

$271,200,656

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,922,627,141

420,368

Markets across

40,352

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,484

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Titled Tuesday Top 3: October 27
kalshi
polymarket

Will the player finish in the top 3?

Volume:
$1,821

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 27, 2026

Closed: Oct 28, 11:31 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

View
100%
89%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$102
N/A
N/A
$102
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Maxime Vachier-Lagrave

100%
43%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$55
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
Yes
kalshi

Arjun Erigaisi

100%
91%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$81
N/A
N/A
$81
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Arjun Erigaisi

100%
93%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$31
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
Yes
kalshi

Hikaru Nakamura

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$747
N/A
N/A
$747
Settled
No
polymarket

Hikaru Nakamura

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$4
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Dmitry Andreikin

0%
26%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$303
N/A
N/A
$303
Settled
No
polymarket

Dmitry Andreikin

0%
100%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$25
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Alireza Firouzja

0%
22%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$199
N/A
N/A
$163
Settled
No
polymarket

Alireza Firouzja

0%
100%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Aleksei Sarana

0%
23%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$190
N/A
N/A
$180
Settled
No
polymarket

Aleksei Sarana

0%
69%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Pranesh Munirethinam

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$39
N/A
N/A
$27
Settled
No
polymarket

Pranesh Munirethinam

0%
100%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Vincent Keymer

0%
10%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$11
N/A
N/A
$11
Settled
No
polymarket

Vincent Keymer

0%
100%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$10
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Sina Movahed

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$7
N/A
N/A
$7
Settled
No
polymarket

Sina Movahed

0%
100%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Artin Ashraf

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$7
N/A
N/A
$7
Settled
No
kalshi

Denis Lazavik

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$5
N/A
N/A
$5
Settled
No
polymarket

Denis Lazavik

0%
100%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Wesley So

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2
N/A
N/A
$2
Settled
No
polymarket

Wesley So

0%
75%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
kalshi

Pranav Venkatesh

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2
N/A
N/A
$2
Settled
No
polymarket

Pranav Venkatesh

0%
100%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1w 1d 4h
No
Total markets: 25 of 137

Description

This group of markets asks whether various chess players will finish in the top 3 of the Titled Tuesday weekly blitz tournament on October 27, 2026. Each market resolves based on the official final standings published by Chess.com.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

Both Polymarket and Kalshi markets share identical resolution criteria: top 3 finish in the Titled Tuesday tournament on October 27, 2026, based on official standings, with a 'No' resolution for non-participation or tournament cancellation/delay.Primary resolution logic: Official standings from Chess.com (https://www.chess.com/events/info/2026-titled-tuesday-blitz)

Core resolution logic:

  • A player must finish in the top 3 of the Titled Tuesday tournament to resolve the market to 'Yes'.
  • If a player does not participate in the tournament, the market resolves to 'No'.
  • If the tournament is postponed after November 10, 2026, or final standings are not published by November 10, 2026, the market resolves to 'No'.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Ties for 3rd Place: If there is a tie for 3rd place, all players involved in the tie will be considered to have finished in the top 3, and the market will resolve to 'Yes' for those players.
  • Tournament Cancellation: If the tournament is canceled before it begins, all markets will resolve to 'No'.
Timing: Markets will resolve once official final standings are published by Chess.com, or on November 11, 2026, at the latest, if no standings are published.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed player finishes in the top 3 of Titled Tuesday on October 27, 2026, according to the final standings published by the tournament organizer. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". If the listed player does not play, their corresponding market will resolve to "No". If this tournament is postponed after November 10, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, canceled, or final standings have not been published within this timeframe, this market will resolve to "No". The resolution source for this market will be official information from the tournament organizer, Chess.com (https://www.chess.com/events/info/2026-titled-tuesday-blitz); however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Kalshi

Each market evaluates whether a specific player finishes in the top three positions of the Titled Tuesday weekly chess competition scheduled for October 27, 2026. The event follows a blitz format and consists of 11 rounds in a Swiss tournament structure. If the named player achieves one of the top three placements, the respective market resolves to 'Yes'; otherwise, it resolves to 'No'. Should the player not participate in the event, the market automatically resolves to 'No'. The operator explicitly states no affiliation with the governing league, and all trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket and Kalshi, this dashboard aggregates real-time predictions on the outcome of the October 27 Titled Tuesday chess competition. Currently, the combined volume across both platforms is $1,821, with $592 traded in the last 24 hours. This allows for a consensus view of probabilities regarding which players will finish in the top three. The dashboard tracks these probabilities as they shift based on trader activity on each platform, offering a comprehensive look at the Titled Tuesday chess market. It’s a valuable tool for understanding the collective wisdom of the crowd regarding this event.

Prediction market odds, like those found in this market, often differ from traditional sportsbook odds due to the nature of how they are determined. Sportsbooks set odds based on their internal models and a margin for profit, while prediction markets are driven by the collective wisdom of traders who are incentivized to accurately forecast the outcome. This can lead to more efficient price discovery, especially when there's a significant amount of volume. However, sportsbooks may offer different types of bets or cater to a different audience, resulting in discrepancies.

Prices on Polymarket and Kalshi for this market can diverge due to several factors. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform has its own user base, trading fees, and liquidity, which can influence price discovery. Differences in the types of traders participating – for example, more sophisticated or casual bettors on each – can also contribute to price discrepancies. Furthermore, the way each platform handles margin requirements or allows for different order types can impact how prices are set. These variations mean that even for the same underlying event, the probabilities expressed on each platform may not always align.