TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.4b

24H VOL:

$230,589,906

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,028,936

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,885,293,300

410,482

Markets across

40,213

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,340

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Qingdao Eagles vs. Tianjin Pioneers
predict
polymarket

What is the result of Qingdao Eagles vs Tianjin Pioneers?

Volume:
$20,107

Qingdao Eagles vs. Tianjin Pioneers

all

2 markets

Polymarket

Predict

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 27, 2026

Closed: Oct 27, 11:49 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Qingdao Eagles vs. Tianjin Pioneers

View
100%
16%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$11,409
N/A
N/A
N/A
12h 23m
Yes
predict

Qingdao Eagles vs. Tianjin Pioneers

100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
$5
$1,460
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Qingdao Eagles (-13.5)

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$4,829
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
predict

Qingdao Eagles (-13.5)

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$140
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

O/U 185.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,144
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
predict

O/U 185.5

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$125
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Description

This event group concerns a single Chinese Basketball Association (CBA) game between the Qingdao Eagles and the Tianjin Pioneers. The markets resolve to which team wins the game, with a 50-50 split if the game is canceled without a reschedule and continued operation if the game is postponed.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

Both platforms utilize identical resolution criteria based on the final game score, including overtime, and handle cancellations/postponements in the same manner.Primary resolution logic: https://www.flashscore.com/basketball/china/cba

Core resolution logic:

  • The market resolves to 'Qingdao Eagles' if the Qingdao Eagles win the game.
  • The market resolves to 'Tianjin Pioneers' if the Tianjin Pioneers win the game.
  • If the game is canceled entirely with no make-up game, the market resolves 50-50.
  • If the game is postponed, the market remains open until the game is completed.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Tie Game: The description specifies resolution based on the 'final score including any overtime periods', implying overtime will be played to break ties. If a tie persists after overtime (highly unlikely in CBA), the resolution source (Flashscore) will determine the official result.
Timing: Resolution will occur after the official completion of the game, as reported by Flashscore.com, including any overtime periods.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

In the upcoming CBA game, scheduled for October 27 at 7:35AM ET: If the Qingdao Eagles win, the market will resolve to "Qingdao Eagles". If the Tianjin Pioneers win, the market will resolve to "Tianjin Pioneers". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Predict

In the upcoming CBA game, scheduled for October 27 at 7:35AM ET: If the Qingdao Eagles win, the market will resolve to "Qingdao Eagles". If the Tianjin Pioneers win, the market will resolve to "Tianjin Pioneers". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket and Predict, this dashboard tracks the consensus view on the outcome of the Qingdao vs. Tianjin game. Currently, the aggregated volume across both platforms is $20,107, with $20,106 traded in the last 24 hours. This allows you to see how traders are pricing in the probability of different results. Polymarket currently shows a strong leaning toward one outcome, while Predict presents a slightly different perspective, offering a comprehensive view of market sentiment. This aggregation helps provide a clearer picture than looking at either Polymarket or Predict in isolation.

Prediction market odds, like those found on Polymarket and Predict for this market, often reflect the wisdom of the crowd, potentially offering a different perspective than traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks set odds based on their own models and aim to profit, while prediction markets allow anyone to trade on their beliefs. This can lead to discrepancies, especially when public opinion differs from expert analysis. While sportsbooks may initially set odds based on team statistics, this market incorporates a broader range of information and real-time sentiment, potentially leading to more accurate probabilities as the event approaches. The volume of $20,107 suggests active trading and evolving expectations.

Polymarket and Predict can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Differences in pricing between Polymarket and Predict can arise from several factors. Each platform has its own user base with varying levels of expertise and access to information regarding the Qingdao vs. Tianjin game. Trading volume, currently at $20,107, can also influence price discovery; lower volume may lead to greater price swings. Furthermore, the specific mechanisms for trading and order execution on each platform can contribute to these differences. One platform might attract more sophisticated traders, while the other may have a broader, less informed audience, resulting in divergent probabilities.