TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.4b

24H VOL:

$230,589,906

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,028,936

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,885,293,300

410,482

Markets across

40,213

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,340

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Porto vs Eindhoven: Second Half Total
kalshi

Porto vs Eindhoven: Second Half Total

Volume:
$2,528

Over 0.5 2H goals scored

 - Kalshi

Over 0.5 2H goals scored - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 20, 2026

Closed: Oct 20, 4:56 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Over 0.5 2H goals scored

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$375
N/A
N/A
$375
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 1.5 2H goals scored

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,082
N/A
N/A
$1,705
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 2.5 2H goals scored

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$71
N/A
N/A
$71
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

These markets assess how many goals will be scored in the second half of an upcoming Champions League soccer match between Porto and Eindhoven. Each market sets a different threshold for the total number of goals needed for resolution. The outcomes depend solely on the number of goals scored during the specified half of the match.

Kalshi

The event consists of three markets evaluating whether the total goals scored by Porto and Eindhoven in the second half of their Champions League match scheduled for October 20, 2026, exceed specified thresholds of 0.5, 1.5, and 2.5 goals, respectively. All markets apply exclusively to goals scored in the second half and share consistent secondary rules: if the match is canceled or rescheduled to more than 48 hours beyond the original date, the markets resolve to a fair price. Each primary rule independently determines resolution based on its threshold, with 'Yes' resolving if the actual second-half goals surpass the market's set value. The shared conditions ensure uniform treatment of scheduling disruptions while preserving distinct outcome criteria for each numerical threshold.