TOTAL VOLUME:
$141.8b
24H VOL:
$86,405,111
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,626,885,236
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,565,917,602
452,269
Markets across
34,849
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
2,912
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
38%
VS.
Kalshi:
62%
Closed: Jul 16, 8:59 PM EST
Kalshi
This market tracks the outcome of the July 16, 2026 MLB matchup between the New York Mets and Philadelphia Phillies, including the game winner and whether the contest extends to extra innings. Across Polymarket, Kalshi, and Predict, the consensus probability for the Mets to cover a -2.5 spread stands at 100.0%, while the probability of extra innings occurring is 0.5%. Resolution will be determined by official MLB statistics published on mlb.com. Watch for the game's conclusion on July 16, 2026 at 7:10 PM ET to see how the actual outcome aligns with market expectations.
In the upcoming MLB game between the New York Mets and Philadelphia Phillies, scheduled for July 16 at 7:10PM ET: This market will resolve to "New York Mets" if the New York Mets win the game. This market will resolve to "Philadelphia Phillies" if the Philadelphia Phillies win the game. If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, or ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official final statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 24 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
The event resolves based on the outcome of the New York M vs Philadelphia professional baseball game originally scheduled for July 16, 2026 at 7:10 PM EDT. If the game is postponed or delayed, the market remains open and closes after the rescheduled game concludes within two days. If the game is cancelled or rescheduled to more than two days away, the market resolves to a fair price in accordance with the rules.
In the upcoming MLB game between the New York Mets and Philadelphia Phillies, scheduled for July 16 at 7:10PM ET: This market will resolve to "New York Mets" if the New York Mets win the game. This market will resolve to "Philadelphia Phillies" if the Philadelphia Phillies win the game. If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, or ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official final statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 24 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
Prediction markets and sportsbooks price events differently because they operate under distinct mechanisms. Sportsbooks set odds to balance their book and manage risk, often adjusting for sharp action and public sentiment. Prediction markets, by contrast, aggregate trader beliefs through continuous price discovery—odds reflect what thousands of participants collectively believe will happen. This market's prices on Polymarket and Predict emerge from decentralized trading rather than a bookmaker's margin. Over time, prediction market odds often prove more accurate than opening sportsbook lines, especially as new information surfaces. Comparing the two can reveal where consensus diverges and highlight potential value.
Polymarket and Predict can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Price differences arise because each platform attracts distinct trader pools, operates under different fee structures, and may have varying liquidity depth. Polymarket and Predict also differ in how quickly they process new information and how their user interfaces influence order flow. Regulatory environments, settlement timelines, and platform-specific incentives can all push prices apart temporarily. These gaps create arbitrage opportunities for traders monitoring both venues simultaneously. Over time, as information spreads and traders exploit mispricings, the two platforms typically converge—but during volatile moments or low-liquidity periods, meaningful spreads can persist.
Key catalysts include lineup announcements, starting pitcher confirmation, and injury updates affecting either team's roster. Weather conditions at game time—wind speed, temperature, and precipitation—can significantly impact run-scoring outcomes. Early inning action itself becomes a powerful signal; if runs score quickly, markets pricing first-inning runs will spike. Momentum shifts during the game, bullpen usage, and strategic decisions by managers all influence live pricing. Breaking news about player availability or last-minute roster changes can trigger sharp repricing across both platforms. Traders monitoring real-time game feeds and team news will react faster than casual bettors, creating trading opportunities throughout the event.