TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.6b

24H VOL:

$333,432,169

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,971,286,090

419,492

Markets across

40,634

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,654

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
New York J vs Chicago: Both Teams to Score in Every Quarter
kalshi

Will both teams score in every quarter?

Volume:
$70

Both teams to score in every quarter

 - Kalshi

Both teams to score in every quarter - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 4, 2026

Closed: Oct 4, 2:00 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Both teams to score in every quarter

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$70
N/A
N/A
$65
Settled
No
Total markets: 1

Description

The contest between New York J and Chicago hinges on whether each team can put points on the board in all four quarters of play. Maintaining this scoring pace across the entire game would demonstrate strong and sustained offensive capabilities from both teams.

Kalshi

If New York J and Chicago both score points in every quarter of regulation of the New York J vs Chicago Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 4, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the New York J vs Chicago BTS market displays the current price, a historical price chart, and 24-hour trading volume. Currently, volume is $70 and total volume is $70. This allows traders to see how the market is moving and assess the level of interest in whether both teams will score in every quarter of the game. The interface provides a real-time view of where traders believe the probability lies for this outcome, and facilitates informed decision-making when buying or selling contracts.

Prediction market odds often reflect the collective wisdom of a diverse group of traders, potentially offering a different perspective than traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks set lines based on their own models and to balance action, while this market aggregates individual predictions. It’s common to see discrepancies, especially before significant events or when new information emerges. While sportsbooks may initially favor one team, the prediction market can quickly adjust based on participant sentiment and analysis, potentially highlighting areas where the sportsbook’s assessment differs from the crowd’s.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous double auction, meaning buyers and sellers set the price by placing bids and asks. The current price represents the probability of the event occurring – both teams scoring in every quarter – as perceived by the market participants. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Traders are incentivized to provide accurate predictions, as profitable trades are rewarded. As more traders participate and new information becomes available, the price will fluctuate, reflecting the evolving consensus on the likelihood of this outcome. The market’s depth and volume indicate the level of confidence in the price.

This market resolves around Oct 4, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Specifically, the resolution will depend on whether both the New York J and Chicago teams score in each of the four quarters of the game. Official game statistics from a trusted source will be used to determine if this condition has been met. The final score will be the determining factor, and the market will settle accordingly, reflecting the actual game results as reported by official sources.

Several factors could influence trading activity and move this market before resolution. Any news regarding key player injuries for either the New York J or Chicago teams would likely have a significant impact. Changes in weather forecasts, particularly if they suggest conditions that favor a high-scoring or low-scoring game, could also shift sentiment. Unexpected announcements about team strategies or coaching decisions might also cause traders to reassess the probability of both teams scoring in every quarter, leading to price adjustments. Public perception and expert analysis can also play a role.