TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.4b

24H VOL:

$245,801,863

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,028,936

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,902,097,102

417,059

Markets across

40,178

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,415

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
NC State vs. Stanford - Exact Margin
polymarket

What is the result of NC State vs. Stanford?

Volume:
N/A

Exact Margin: NC State by 1-6

 - Polymarket

Exact Margin: NC State by 1-6 - Polymarket

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 24, 2026

Closed: Oct 24, 2:19 AM EST

polymarket

Polymarket

View
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
polymarket

Exact Margin: NC State by 1-6

View
0%
96%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: NC State by 7-12

0%
95%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: NC State by 13-18

0%
93%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: NC State by 19-24

0%
95%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: NC State by 25+

0%
95%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: Tie

0%
97%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: Stanford by 1-6

100%
5%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Exact Margin: Stanford by 7-12

0%
76%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: Stanford by 13-18

0%
95%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: Stanford by 19-24

0%
90%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
polymarket

Exact Margin: Stanford by 25+

0%
91%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 11

Description

Exact margin markets for NC State vs. Stanford.

Polymarket

Exact margin markets for NC State vs. Stanford.

Frequently asked questions

Typically, prediction market odds reflect the wisdom of the crowd and can differ from traditional sportsbook odds. Sportsbooks often set initial lines to balance action, while this market’s prices are driven purely by traders’ willingness to buy or sell, representing their collective belief about the most likely outcome. Discrepancies can arise due to differing information sources, biases, or simply the dynamics of each market. It’s common to see this market adjust more rapidly to new information than sportsbook lines, as it incorporates a wider range of perspectives.

On Polymarket, this market is priced through a continuous auction mechanism where traders can buy and sell shares representing different exact margins in the NC State vs. Stanford game. The price of each share reflects the market’s implied probability of that specific margin occurring. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. As more traders participate, the prices converge towards what the market believes is the fair probability. The market’s depth – the number of shares available at each price point – also influences price movements, indicating the strength of conviction behind different outcomes.

This market resolves around Oct 24, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the final score of the NC State vs. Stanford game is verifiable from credible public reporting. The market will settle to 100% probability for the exact margin that occurred in the game. Any discrepancies in reported scores will be assessed against official game data to ensure accurate resolution. Traders holding shares in the correct margin will receive a payout equivalent to their share multiplied by the market’s price at the time of resolution.

Several factors could influence the price of this market. Any news regarding injuries to key players on either the NC State or Stanford teams would likely cause significant movement. Changes in weather forecasts, particularly if they suggest conditions favoring one team’s playing style, could also impact trading activity. Late-breaking news about team strategies or coaching decisions might prompt traders to reassess their probabilities. Even public sentiment, reflected in social media or expert analysis, can contribute to shifts in the market’s pricing.