TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.3b

24H VOL:

$228,458,490

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,028,936

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,879,276,037

410,833

Markets across

40,345

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,363

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Michigan St. vs UCLA: 2nd Quarter Winner
kalshi

What is the result of Michigan St. vs UCLA?

Volume:
$4,556

UCLA

 - Kalshi

UCLA - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 24, 2026

Closed: Oct 24, 5:26 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

UCLA

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,950
N/A
N/A
$1,591
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Michigan St.

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,563
N/A
N/A
$1,047
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,043
N/A
N/A
$977
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market focuses on determining which team will score more points in a specific quarter of an upcoming college football game between Michigan State and UCLA. The outcome depends solely on the performance during the second quarter, regardless of the overall game result.

Kalshi

If UCLA wins the 2nd quarter of the Michigan St. vs UCLA college football game originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. If Michigan St. wins the 2nd quarter of the Michigan St. vs UCLA college football game originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. If neither team wins the 2nd quarter of the Michigan St. vs UCLA college football game originally scheduled for Oct 24, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Michigan State vs UCLA 2nd quarter market tracks the current odds, price history, and 24-hour trading volume. You can see how the implied probabilities of each outcome are changing in real-time, as well as review past price movements to understand market sentiment. Currently, the 24-hour volume is $4,556 and the total volume is $4,556. This allows traders to gauge interest and potential shifts in expectations for which team will win the second quarter.

Typically, prediction market odds reflect the wisdom of the crowd and can differ from traditional sportsbook odds. Sportsbooks set lines based on their own models and need to account for profit margins, while this market is driven by traders directly expressing their beliefs about the outcome. If a significant discrepancy exists, arbitrage opportunities may arise, where traders can profit by simultaneously betting on both platforms. However, it’s important to remember that both represent probabilities of the same event, and differences can stem from varying information or interpretations.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order book where traders buy and sell contracts representing each possible outcome. The price of each contract reflects the market’s collective belief about the probability of that outcome occurring. As more traders participate, the prices adjust to reflect new information and changing sentiment. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price movements are driven by supply and demand; if more people buy contracts for a particular outcome, the price increases, and vice versa. This dynamic pricing mechanism aims to provide a real-time assessment of the event's likelihood.

This market resolves around Oct 24, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Specifically, the market will determine which team is leading at the end of the second quarter of the Michigan State vs UCLA game. The result will be based on the official game statistics as reported by a recognized sports data provider. Traders will be able to view the resolution details on Kalshi once the official results are available, and payouts will be processed accordingly.

Several factors could influence this market before resolution. Any news regarding player injuries, changes in coaching strategies, or even weather conditions could shift expectations. Public sentiment, as reflected in polls or expert analyses, can also play a role. Unexpected performance in the first quarter of the game would likely cause significant movement in the market. Furthermore, large trading volume from informed participants could indicate a shift in belief about the likely winner of the second quarter, prompting others to adjust their positions.