TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.5b

24H VOL:

$271,200,656

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,922,627,141

420,368

Markets across

40,352

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,484

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana vs Igokea Aleksandrovac
kalshi

What is the result of KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana vs Igokea Aleksandrovac?

Volume:
$12,028

KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana

 - Kalshi

KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 17, 2026

Closed: Oct 17, 3:26 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$5,588
N/A
N/A
$5,310
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Igokea Aleksandrovac

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$6,440
N/A
N/A
$5,468
Settled
No
Total markets: 2

Description

This market follows the result of a professional basketball contest between KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana and Igokea Aleksandrovac in the Adriatic ABA League. A win by Igokea Aleksandrovac on the scheduled date determines a positive resolution. The market accounts for postponements within 48 hours, resolving based on the final outcome, and handles cancellations with fair price resolution.

Kalshi

Markets resolve based on the winner of the KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana vs Igokea Aleksandrovac men's professional Adriatic ABA basketball game scheduled for October 17, 2026, at 1:00 PM EDT. If the game is postponed but begins within 48 hours of the original time, markets stay open and resolve according to the official result. If the game is cancelled or does not start within 48 hours of the scheduled time, all markets resolve to a fair price. Kalshi is not affiliated with the Governing League, and all trademarks belong to their respective owners.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the KK Cedevita vs Igokea match tracks the current odds, price history, and 24-hour trading volume. You’ll find a visual representation of how the market is pricing the outcome, allowing you to see shifts in sentiment over time. Currently, the 24-hour volume is $12,028, and the total volume traded on this market is $12,028. This provides insight into how actively traders are engaging with this particular event. The dashboard is updated in real-time, reflecting the latest activity.

Prediction market odds often reflect the wisdom of the crowd, potentially differing from sportsbook odds which are set by professional oddsmakers. Sportsbooks may incorporate factors like public perception or promotional offers, while this market relies on individuals directly expressing their beliefs about the outcome. If sportsbook odds significantly diverge from those seen here, it could indicate a disagreement about the true probability of a particular result. It’s important to remember that both represent probabilities, but are derived through different mechanisms and can therefore vary.

This market resolves around Oct 17, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The resolution will be based on the official result of the KK Cedevita Olimpija Ljubljana vs Igokea Aleksandrovac match, as reported by a recognized sports authority. The market will determine which outcome is the winning contract based on the final score and official game results. Traders will then be able to claim their winnings or fulfill their obligations based on their positions in this market.

Several factors could influence the price of this market before resolution. Any news regarding player injuries, changes in team lineups, or coaching decisions could significantly impact expectations. Unexpected performance in prior matches, or even weather conditions if the game is played outdoors, could also shift the odds. Public sentiment, as reflected in news articles or social media, can also play a role, though this market relies on traders’ direct assessments rather than simply mirroring external opinions. Major upsets in related games could also cause traders to reassess probabilities.