TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.6b

24H VOL:

$323,326,361

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,969,435,260

419,363

Markets across

40,411

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,612

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
API
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Elections
Crypto
Companies
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
Giugliano Calcio 1928 vs. Casertana FC
kalshi
polymarket

What is the result of Giugliano Calcio 1928 vs Casertana FC?

Volume:
$12,033

Giugliano

all

2 markets

Kalshi

Polymarket

consensus

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 31, 2026

Closed: Oct 31, 11:32 AM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Giugliano

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$7,000
N/A
N/A
$5,928
Settled
Yes
polymarket

Giugliano Calcio 1928

View
100%
76%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
$4,747
$271
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Casertana

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$2,606
N/A
N/A
$1,862
Settled
No
polymarket

Casertana FC

View
0%
50%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
$13,926
$65
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,966
N/A
N/A
$1,692
Settled
No
polymarket

Draw (Giugliano Calcio 1928 vs. Casertana FC)

View
0%
25%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
$2,594
$124
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
No
Total markets: 6

Description

This group forecasts the outcome of a Serie C soccer match between Giugliano Calcio 1928 and Casertana FC on October 31, 2026. Markets exist for Giugliano winning, Casertana winning, and the game ending in a draw. Resolution depends on the official match result, with fallback sources specified.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Polymarket explicitly resolves canceled games to 'No', while Kalshi lacks this specific rule, potentially leading to different outcomes.Hero tip: Factor in the possibility of game cancellation when trading, as Polymarket's rule could create discrepancies with Kalshi.

Critical divergence points:

  • Polymarket: Resolves to 'No' if the game is canceled with no make-up game. Uses a tiered source hierarchy (official stats, Flashscore, Sofascore, consensus)."If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve "No"."
  • Kalshi: Focuses on the result after 90 minutes plus stoppage time. Doesn't explicitly address cancellation, implying reliance on a result or a default resolution. "If Tie is the result of the Giugliano vs Casertana professional Serie C soccer game originally scheduled for Oct 31, 2026 after 90 minutes plus stoppage time (does not include extra time or penalties), then the market resolves to Yes."
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This event is for the upcoming Serie C game, scheduled for Saturday, October 31, 2026 between Giugliano Calcio 1928 and Casertana FC.

Kalshi

The event covers three possible outcomes of the Giugliano vs Casertana professional Serie C soccer match scheduled for October 31, 2026: a win for Giugliano, a win for Casertana, or a tie. Each market resolves based on the result after the full 90 minutes of regulation time plus any stoppage time, excluding extra time or penalty kicks. If the match ends in a tie after regulation, the 'Tie' market resolves to Yes. If the game is cancelled or rescheduled to more than 48 hours beyond the original date, all markets will resolve to a fair price following the platform's guidelines. The platform explicitly states it is not affiliated with the governing league, and all trademarks remain the property of their respective owners.

Frequently asked questions

On Polymarket and Kalshi, this dashboard tracks the consensus view on the outcome of the Giugliano vs. Casertana match. Currently, the aggregated volume across both platforms is $12,033, with $11,825 traded in the last 24 hours. Polymarket currently favors a Giugliano Calcio 1928 win at approximately 48.5%, while Kalshi leans toward a tie. This allows traders to see how predictions are evolving and compare probabilities across different venues. The dashboard provides a comprehensive overview of the market for this specific match, aggregating data to give a broader perspective than either platform alone.

Prediction market odds, like those found for this market, often reflect the wisdom of the crowd, potentially offering a different perspective than traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks set lines based on their own models and aim to balance action on both sides, incorporating a profit margin. Prediction markets, however, allow anyone to trade, and prices are driven purely by supply and demand. This can lead to discrepancies, with prediction markets sometimes being more accurate, especially when there's significant public information available. Comparing the odds can reveal where the crowd disagrees with experts and identify potential value.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Prices on Polymarket and Kalshi can diverge due to several factors. These platforms have different user bases, trading volumes, and fee structures, all of which influence price discovery. Furthermore, each platform may attract different types of traders – some more sophisticated, others more casual – leading to varying interpretations of available information. The volume of trading on this market is currently $12,033, and differing volume between Polymarket and Kalshi can amplify price discrepancies. Finally, differing liquidity can also contribute to price separation.